ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for post-stroke cognitive impairment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based prediction of 3-6-month post-stroke cognitive impairment using acute-phase clinical data: a two-center retrospective prognostic modeling study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Machine learning in bleeding risk assessment for low-molecular-weight heparin or fondaparinux: a predictive model study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- The XGBoost Model Versus the Logistic Regression Model Created Based on Serum Markers in Predicting the Risk of Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment Following Acute Ischemic Stroke.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Development and internal evaluation of an interpretable machine learning model based on clinical and radiomics features to differentiate lower extremity arterial embolism from atherothrombosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Dynamic trajectories of inflammatory biomarkers and post-stroke cognitive impairment: a comprehensive review of neuroimmune mechanisms, longitudinal modeling, and clinical translation.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) risk prediction models for post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) are still far from optimal. This study aims to generate a reliable predictive model for predicting PSCI in Chinese individuals using ML algorithms. We collected data on 494 individuals who were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and hospitalized for this condition from January 2022 to November 2023 at a Chinese medical institution. We assessed cognitive function of patients recently diagnosed with a stroke (in the preceding 3-6 months), PSCI was determined from MMSE or MOCA scores. All of the observed samples were divided into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%) at random. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalty and logistic regression (LR) can help filter the best predictive features for PSCI from 49 common clinical parameters collected on admission. We utilized seven different ML models, including LR, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gaussian naive bayes (GNB), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and compared their performance for the resulting variables. We used tenfold cross-validation to measure the model's AUROC (Area under the receiver operating characteristic), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1 score and AP (Average precision) values. SHAP (Shapley additive exPlanations) analysis provides a comprehensive and detailed explanation of our optimized model's performance. PSCI was identified in 58.50% of the 494 eligible AIS patients. Age, National institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS), Hamilton depression scale (HAMD)-24, Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), ALB, FBG, hypertension, paraventricular lesion, and number of lesions were significant influencing features of PSCI. The AUROC of the XGBoost model is 0.980, which is better than the prediction performance of the other models (LR: 0.808, LightGBM: 0.800, AdaBoost: 0.893, GNB: 0.789, MLP: 0.745, and SVM: 0.868). The XGBoost model, leveraging predictors including age, NIHSS, HAMD-24, PSQI, ALB, FBG, hypertension, paraventricular lesion, and number of lesions, effectively predicts mild to moderate cognitive impairment 3-6 months post-stroke. This tool enables early identification of at-risk patients, facilitating timely clinical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.