Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006767›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development and validation of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for post-stroke cognitive impairment.

Xia Zhong, Tianen Zhao, Shimeng Lv, Guangheng Zhang, Jing Li, Donghai Liu, Huachen Jiao

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xia ZhongInstitute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, No.38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Tianen ZhaoJinan Lixia Dezhengtang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, 250000, People's Republic of China.
Shimeng LvInstitute of First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, 250011, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Guangheng ZhangInstitute of First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, 250011, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Jing LiInstitute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, No.38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China. jing.li@hsc.pku.edu.cn.
Donghai LiuCollege of Laboratory Animal Science, Shandong First Medical University, No.6699, Qingdao Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, People's Republic of China. jinanatp@163.com.
Huachen JiaoInstitute of Cardiology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Room 101, Unit 3, Building 1, No. 125, Huanshan Road, Lixia District, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China. liyixuan0531@163.com.

Funding

Shandong Province Key Research and Development Program, China's Major Science and Technology Innovation Project 2021SFGC0503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) risk prediction models for post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) are still far from optimal. This study aims to generate a reliable predictive model for predicting PSCI in Chinese individuals using ML algorithms. We collected data on 494 individuals who were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and hospitalized for this condition from January 2022 to November 2023 at a Chinese medical institution. We assessed cognitive function of patients recently diagnosed with a stroke (in the preceding 3-6 months), PSCI was determined from MMSE or MOCA scores. All of the observed samples were divided into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%) at random. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalty and logistic regression (LR) can help filter the best predictive features for PSCI from 49 common clinical parameters collected on admission. We utilized seven different ML models, including LR, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gaussian naive bayes (GNB), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and compared their performance for the resulting variables. We used tenfold cross-validation to measure the model's AUROC (Area under the receiver operating characteristic), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1 score and AP (Average precision) values. SHAP (Shapley additive exPlanations) analysis provides a comprehensive and detailed explanation of our optimized model's performance. PSCI was identified in 58.50% of the 494 eligible AIS patients. Age, National institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS), Hamilton depression scale (HAMD)-24, Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), ALB, FBG, hypertension, paraventricular lesion, and number of lesions were significant influencing features of PSCI. The AUROC of the XGBoost model is 0.980, which is better than the prediction performance of the other models (LR: 0.808, LightGBM: 0.800, AdaBoost: 0.893, GNB: 0.789, MLP: 0.745, and SVM: 0.868). The XGBoost model, leveraging predictors including age, NIHSS, HAMD-24, PSQI, ALB, FBG, hypertension, paraventricular lesion, and number of lesions, effectively predicts mild to moderate cognitive impairment 3-6 months post-stroke. This tool enables early identification of at-risk patients, facilitating timely clinical interventions.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionMachine LearningStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveSupport Vector MachineMachine learningPost-stroke cognitive impairmentPrediction modelRisk factorsROC curveSHAP analysis

Identifiers

PMID41006767
PMCPMC12475280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.