ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2025
Long term anticoagulation for Catheter-Related deep vein thrombosis of the upper extremities in women with cancer: retrospective analysis of effectiveness and safety outcomes.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inflammation-coagulation biomarkers predict catheter-related thrombosis following peripherally inserted central catheter placement in patients with hematologic malignancies: a retrospective cohort study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Risk Factors for Catheter-Related Thrombosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Thrombosis in patients with cancer: challenges and advances.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Catheter-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (CRT-UEDVT) is a possible complication in patients with cancer carrying a central venous catheter. Anticoagulation is the primary treatment, but optimal duration is unclear. This study evaluated effectiveness and safety of different lengths of anticoagulation in women with cancer and CRT-UEDVT. We conducted a retrospective analysis on women ≥ 18 years-old, who had active cancer and had received anticoagulant treatment for CRT-UEDVT. Effectiveness was assessed in terms of VTE recurrence and thrombosis recanalization. Safety was determined by assessing major bleedings (MB) and clinically relevant non-major bleedings (CRNMB) during treatment. A total of 113 women where included. All of them had completed at least 3 months of anticoagulant therapy, while 106 and 97 had completed 6 and 12 months of anticoagulant therapy, respectively. The median follow-up was 568.5 days (IQR 300-910). Patients primarily presented with ovarian, breast, and endometrial cancers. Anticoagulant therapy was mainly parenteral during the initial 3 months and between 3 and 6 months, shifting predominantly to direct oral anticoagulants during months 6-12. The annual VTE recurrence rate was 0.5%. The annual rate of MB and CRNMB was 1.9%. Complete thrombosis recanalization was achieved in 52.0%, 69.1%, and 87.3% of patients at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Our study provides interesting insights into the management and clinical outcomes of women with cancer and CRT-UEDVT. Prospective studies are needed to fully understand advantages and disadvantages of different lengths of anticoagulation in this set of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.