ArticleScientific reports2025
An evaluation of maximizing production and usage of biofuel by machine learning and experimental approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cyclization-Modulated Structure and Oxidative Behavior of Methoxy-Substituted Chalcones: Implications for Diesel-Biodiesel Additive Design.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Deep learning enhanced prediction framework for bio oil yield from organic solid waste with chemically informed features.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Performance emission and combustion characteristics of TIO₂ and CEO₂ nanoparticle enhanced Mahua biodiesel diesel blends using experimental and machine learning approaches.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work explores a novel integration of experimental conversion of waste cooking oil (WCO) into biodiesel with advanced machine learning modeling to optimize transesterification outcomes. A reusable CaO catalyst derived from egg shells was employed, delivering a more affordable and sustainable option compared to typical homogeneous catalysts. A total of 16 experimental runs were conducted to investigate the effects of catalyst concentration (CC), reaction temperature (RT), and methanol-to-oil molar ratio (MOR) on biodiesel yield. Four boosted ML algorithms XGBoost, AdaBoost, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), and CatBoost were applied to model the process, with hyperparameter tuning via grid search and validation through k-fold cross-validation (k = 5) and residual plots to ensure reliability and mitigate overfitting. CatBoost emerged as the best-performing model (R² = 0.955, RMSE = 0.83, MSE = 0.68, MAE = 0.52), predicting a maximum biodiesel yield of 95% at 3% CC, 80 °C RT, and a 6:1 MOR. Feature importance and partial dependence plots identified MOR and CC as the most influential parameters. Engine performance tests further validated the practical viability of CaO-based biodiesel, showing 26% lower CO emissions and 13% lower smoke emissions compared to diesel, resulting in a marginal 2.83% decline in brake thermal efficiency alongside a 4.31% rise in fuel consumption. This interdisciplinary approach combining green catalyst development with interpretable machine learning demonstrates a promising pathway for cleaner energy applications and data-driven optimization in biodiesel research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.