ArticleScientific reports2025
Fine art image classification and design methods integrating lightweight deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes an efficient fine art image classification method integrating lightweight deep learning to address the limitations of low efficiency and poor generalization in art image classification tasks. The approach designs a lightweight hybrid network, MobileNet-Transformer Hybrid (MTH), that combines depthwise separable convolution with multi-head self-attention mechanisms to achieve efficient fusion of local details and global semantics. A dynamic channel-spatial attention module (DCSAM) adaptively enhances style-sensitive feature responses, while a cross-style feature transfer (CSFT) framework employs contrastive learning to align different style distributions and improve model robustness. Experiments conducted on the ArtBench-10 and WikiArt datasets validate the model's performance in both classification accuracy and computational efficiency. The results demonstrate: (1) The proposed method enhances local style-discriminative features such as brushstrokes and colors through the DCSAM module, effectively alleviating the misjudgment problem of similar artistic styles. Among them, the CSFT framework constrains the cross-style feature distance through contrastive loss, improving the generalization of rare styles in long-tailed data. (2) The parameter count of the proposed model (1.2 M) is 14.8% of that of EfficientNetV2-S (8.1 million (M)) and 4.2% of that of Swin Tiny (28.3 M). Under this lightweight condition, the proposed model still maintains an ArtBench-10 classification accuracy of 85.2%. Overall, this study provides an efficient solution for art design automation and cultural heritage digitization, offering theoretical innovation and practical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.