ArticleEye (London, England)2025
Generative artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: a scoping review of current applications, opportunities, and challenges.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethical considerations in generative artificial intelligence for synthetic data generation in ophthalmology.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Perceived Trust in Artificial Intelligence in Eye Care: Demographic Determinants and Variations in Attitudes Among Ophthalmologists and Residents.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Advances in the application of artificial intelligence in ophthalmic education and clinical training.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential for enhancing diagnostic accuracy, augmenting image datasets, and simulating disease progression in ophthalmology. There is a paucity in the literature regarding a comprehensive mapping of the broad range of generative AI models. A scoping review was conducted to (1) identify and categorise generative AI models applied in ophthalmology, (2) examine their primary clinical and research applications, (3) evaluate the feasibility and challenges of deploying these models in clinical practice, and (4) outline future research directions. Primary research articles published in English over the past 10 years, explicitly referencing a generative AI method for ophthalmic imaging modalities were included. Searches were conducted on, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science up to December 24, 2024. One reviewer independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts and subsequently charted data using a calibrated extraction form. Data regarding study design, generative AI type, and clinical outcomes or applications were included. 40 studies were included, with most studies focused on data augmentation (n = 11) and predictive modelling (n = 11), followed by image enhancement (n = 8), segmentation (n = 7), and education/interpretability (n = 3). GAN-based approaches predominated, but diffusion models, VAEs, and flow-based models have recently gained traction. Implementation barriers included data availability, regulatory considerations, and model stability. This scoping review mapped the current applications of generative AI in ophthalmology and identified emerging trends, such as diffusion models. Although these methods hold promise, robust real-world validation and clearer regulatory pathways are needed to fully integrate generative AI into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.