Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006683›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2025

Generative artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: a scoping review of current applications, opportunities, and challenges.

Aljeena Rahat Qureshi, Jonathan A Micieli, Jovi C Y Wong

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ethical considerations in generative artificial intelligence for synthetic data generation in ophthalmology.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aljeena Rahat QureshiTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9462-6482
Jonathan A MicieliDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jovi C Y WongDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. jovi.wong@mail.utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7980-9352

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential for enhancing diagnostic accuracy, augmenting image datasets, and simulating disease progression in ophthalmology. There is a paucity in the literature regarding a comprehensive mapping of the broad range of generative AI models. A scoping review was conducted to (1) identify and categorise generative AI models applied in ophthalmology, (2) examine their primary clinical and research applications, (3) evaluate the feasibility and challenges of deploying these models in clinical practice, and (4) outline future research directions. Primary research articles published in English over the past 10 years, explicitly referencing a generative AI method for ophthalmic imaging modalities were included. Searches were conducted on, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science up to December 24, 2024. One reviewer independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts and subsequently charted data using a calibrated extraction form. Data regarding study design, generative AI type, and clinical outcomes or applications were included. 40 studies were included, with most studies focused on data augmentation (n = 11) and predictive modelling (n = 11), followed by image enhancement (n = 8), segmentation (n = 7), and education/interpretability (n = 3). GAN-based approaches predominated, but diffusion models, VAEs, and flow-based models have recently gained traction. Implementation barriers included data availability, regulatory considerations, and model stability. This scoping review mapped the current applications of generative AI in ophthalmology and identified emerging trends, such as diffusion models. Although these methods hold promise, robust real-world validation and clearer regulatory pathways are needed to fully integrate generative AI into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalEye DiseasesOphthalmologyGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumans

Identifiers

PMID41006683
PMCPMC12583551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.