Observational studyScientific reports2025
Difference between mean gestational sac diameter and crown rump length predicts pregnancy outcome in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06081556 (Difference Between Mean Gestational Sac Diameter and Crown-rump Length as a Marker of First-trimester Pregnancy Outcome in Patients With Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Difference Between Mean Gestational Sac Diameter and Crown-rump Length as a Marker of First-trimester Pregnancy Outcome in Patients With Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early pregnancy with low β-hCG levels progressing to severe preeclampisa: a case report highlighting individualized management strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Knowing the predictors of pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) is extremely critical. Accordingly, we aimed to determine the effects of the difference between mean gestational sac diameter and crown-rump length (mGSD-CRL) on the pregnancy outcomes in patients with RSA at 6-10 gestational weeks, as well as to explore its significance in predicting the pregnancy outcomes of patients with RSA. This retrospective cohort study included 256 pregnant women at 6-10 weeks of gestation and with RSA who had visited our hospital from January 2020 to March 2023. The patients were allocated to three groups based on the mGSD-CRL difference: Group A: mGSD-CRL ≤ 10 mm, Group B: 10 mm < mGSD-CRL ≤ 15 mm, and Group C: mGSD-CRL > 15 mm. The pregnancy failure rate in Group A was 22%, which was higher than those that in Group B (5.5%) and Group C (9.4%), with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the mGSD (odd ratio [OR] = 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-1.23, P = 0.001), the CRL (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.05-1.28, P = 0.004), and mGSD-CRL (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.01-1.24, P = 0.026) were independent risk factors affecting the pregnancy outcome of patients with RSA. However, the uterine artery peak systolic value to end-diastolic value (UtA-S/D), D-dimer (DD), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and arachidonic acid (AA) were not related (P > 0.05). The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of mGSD-CRL at 6-10 weeks of pregnancy was 0.566, with a cutoff value of 9.50 mm. The sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 36%, respectively. Compared with their prediction value, the combined prediction of mGSD-CRL, mGSD, and CRL exhibited a higher value (AUC = 0.718) in predicting pregnancy outcomes. A weak negative correlation was detected between ADP and mGSD-CRL difference (r = - 0.165, P = 0.025). In patients with RSA, mGSD-CRL acts as an independent risk factor affecting pregnancy outcomes, thereby effectively predicting the early pregnancy outcomes of patients with RSA. Thus, a low mGSD-CRL difference signifies the heightened probability of miscarriage, thereby urgently requiring clinicians to pay timely attention. Trial registration: The study is registered at ClinincalTrails.gov (Trial registration number: NCT06081556, October 13, 2023).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.