ArticleScientific reports2025
An approach to flow field prediction over the horizontal axis wind turbine by passive flow control device using CNN-Autoencoder model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this research is to predict the flow pattern on the horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT) by introducing spherical dimples on the blades' surfaces. For this purpose, 600 sections are defined for the blades of both dimpled HAWT and the original turbine. The airfoil shape images from each section undergo processing and conversion into distance functions (DFs) using the Signed-Distance Field (SDF) method. Following the preparation of the input, which includes the airfoil profiles, and the output, consisting of pressure (P) and velocity (U) contours, four Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models in auto-encoders form (CNN-AEs) have been designed, two of which include with skip-connection (SC). The mean square error (MSE) and Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) of the CNN-AE without SC for P and U test data has been reported as [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], 7.970[Formula: see text] ± 1.381[Formula: see text], and 7.256[Formula: see text] ± 1.169[Formula: see text], respectively. The results show that the models can accurately estimate P and U from the airfoil section images. In addition, the hyperparameters of the designed CNN-AE models have been optimized to reduce the number of trainable parameters, which can overcome the limitation of the small amount of data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.