ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of operational challenges and technological performance of wastewater treatment plants in Addis Ababa.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid urban expansion has led to increased wastewater generation and mounting pressure on existing wastewater treatment plants This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of selected wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Addis Ababa, with a particular focus on operational efficiency, technological deployment, and institutional and financial challenges. A mixed-method approach was adopted, integrating quantitative data from plant operations with qualitative insights derived from stakeholder interviews and on-site observations. The assessment covered key treatment technologies including the Activated Sludge Process (ASP), Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor (UASBR), and Membrane Bioreactor (MBR), whose performances were evaluated against national effluent discharge standards. MBR systems were found to be predominantly utilized in decentralized treatment facilities, representing 81.8% of such installations, whereas UASBR technology was mainly employed at the central municipal plant. A significant positive correlation was identified between plant treatment capacity and workforce size, with higher-capacity facilities necessitating more personnel. Operationally, 89.1% of the surveyed WWTPs had functional treatment stages, while 10.9% were non-operational. Key operational challenges included equipment malfunctions, poor sludge management, odor emissions, influent flow rate fluctuations (reported in 86.4% of facilities), and limited hydraulic or treatment capacity (64.5%). Financial constraints, reported by 70% of respondents, and low levels of community awareness (20.9%) further impeded effective WWTP operation. These findings underscore the critical need for strategic investment, institutional capacity building, stakeholder engagement, and policy reform to enhance the sustainability, resilience, and long-term performance of wastewater treatment infrastructure not only in Addis Ababa but also in other urban centers facing similar developmental and environmental challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.