ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of cytotoxic constituents from Siegesbeckiae Herba and network pharmacology prediction of their anti-pancreatic cancer mechanisms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer remains a challenging malignancy with limited treatment options. This study aimed to isolate bioactive compounds from Siegesbeckiae Herba and explore their potential mechanisms against pancreatic cancer through network pharmacology and molecular docking. Twenty compounds, including one new compound, were isolated via chromatographic methods and structurally identified by NMR and mass spectrometry. Cytotoxicity of these compounds was evaluated against the human pancreatic cancer cell line PANC-1 using the CCK-8 assay. Two flavonoid constituents, compound 16 (8, 3’-dihydroxy-3, 7, 4’-trimethoxy-6-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl) and compound 17 (quercetin-3-methyl ether), exhibited cytotoxicity, with compound 16 showing the most potent activity (IC50 = 4.48 ± 0.74 µg/mL). Network pharmacology analysis identified 182 potential targets for these compounds, including key targets such as AKT1, PIK3CA, SRC, and HRAS etc. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses indicated enrichment of critical pathways such as PI3K-Akt, Ras, and HIF-1 signaling, which regulate cell proliferation, migration, inflammation, and apoptosis. Molecular docking confirmed strong interactions between compounds 16 and 17 and key pancreatic cancer targets, yet the two flavonoids occupied distinct active pockets. Notably, compound 16 displayed stronger binding affinities (<-7.8 kcal/mol) toward top-ranked targets including HRAS, PIK3CB, PIK3CA, and HSP90AA1. Our results suggest flavonoids from Siegesbeckiae Herba, especially compound 16, as promising candidates for pancreatic cancer treatment, warranting further pharmacological investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.