ArticleScientific reports2025
AI literacy predicts computational thinking through multidimensional interactions among Chinese high school students.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the promotion of AI applications, people have undergone various changes, especially high school students who have a strong sense of engagement in AI-related activities. In order to explore the interactive mechanism and influencing factors between AI literacy and computing thinking level of high school students in H city, this study focuses on the relationship between student background, AI literacy, and computational thinking. By conducting a questionnaire survey of hundreds of high school students and using SPSS for descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and correlation analysis, the focus is on exploring the impact and interrelationships between the three dimensions of AI literacy and the five dimensions of computational thinking. A structural equation model (SEM) was constructed by using AMOS software to further explore its internal complex correlation relationship. The results show that parental education and daily use of AI tools significantly affect students' AI knowledge and skills, while factors such as gender and family location have different degrees of positive or negative effects on creativity, algorithmic thinking, and critical thinking. In addition, artificial intelligence literacy is moderately positively correlated with some dimensions of computational thinking. This study provides empirical support for the rational planning of AI courses in the basic education stage, strengthening the cultivation of students' computational thinking and optimizing teaching practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.