ArticleScientific reports2025
The sensory profile of students with probable developmental coordination disorder (DCD).
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Persistent Sensory, Motor and Functional Difficulties From Childhood to Adolescence in Developmental Coordination Disorder.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) in children often co-occurs with sensory processing difficulties, which exacerbate the negative ramifications of DCD. Yet the evidence of this co-occurrence in adults is limited. The aim of this study is to compare the sensory profiles of typically developing (TD) and probable-DCD (pDCD) adults, while controlling for attention deficits, which is prevalent in this population. This study followed a cross-sectional comparative and correlational design. A sample of 225 university students was divided into two groups based on the cutoff score of the Adolescents & Adults Coordination Questionnaire (pDCD score > 26, (1-1.65 SD). Sixty-three and 162 students were assigned to the pDCD and typically developing groups, respectively. All participants completed the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile (AASP) and an attention symptoms questionnaire. Significant group effects were found on all sensory systems of the AASP, except for taste/smell. Furthermore, students with pDCD showed significantly more deficits on the registration and sensitivity quadrants, even when attention was controlled. The findings of high prevalence of sensory processing difficulties among university students with pDCD support the theoretical assumptions related to co- occurrence between these disorders as reported in previous limited studies. These results demonstrate the importance of assessing the sensory profile of this population and providing intervention accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.