ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning enhanced design and knowledge discovery for multi-junction photonic power converters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Overcoming the rate-power trade-off: multi-junction photovoltaic receivers for efficient near-infrared power and gigabit data transmission.NPJ wireless technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning is proving to be a revolutionary tool across many disciplines, including optoelectronic device design. In this report, we compare classical and machine learning enhanced design optimization methodologies. We investigate, as an example case, the design of the complex structures of ten-junction InP lattice matched photonic power converters with In[Formula: see text]Ga[Formula: see text]As absorbers optimized for operation at 1550 nm. We find that the implicit pattern recognition capabilities of dimensionality reduction using principal component analysis accelerate design discovery, optimization, and the understanding of complex optical phenomena in the simulated devices. The dimensionality reduction approach offers over twenty times as many optimal designs with greater variability and with a 15% reduction in computational cost compared to a classical optimization method. Furthermore, we find that the representation of the reduced dimensionality subspace offers an intuitive interpretation of optical phenomena expected to occur in this design problem. This method is general and offers the potential for knowledge discovery, expanded design perspective, and optimization acceleration in conjunction with a significant reduction in computational expense in systems which can be numerically modeled.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.