Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006519›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning enhanced design and knowledge discovery for multi-junction photonic power converters.

Robert F H Hunter, Gavin P Forcade, Yuri Grinberg, D Paige Wilson, Meghan N Beattie, Christopher E Valdivia, Mathieu de Lafontaine, Louis-Philippe St-Arnaud, Henning Helmers, Oliver Höhn and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Robert F H HunterSUNLAB, Nexus for Quantum Technologies Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. rhunt013@uottawa.ca.
Gavin P ForcadeSUNLAB, Nexus for Quantum Technologies Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Yuri GrinbergDigital Technologies Research Centre, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
D Paige WilsonSUNLAB, Nexus for Quantum Technologies Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Meghan N BeattieSUNLAB, Nexus for Quantum Technologies Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Christopher E ValdiviaSUNLAB, Nexus for Quantum Technologies Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Mathieu de LafontaineSUNLAB, Nexus for Quantum Technologies Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Louis-Philippe St-ArnaudSUNLAB, Nexus for Quantum Technologies Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Henning HelmersFraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE, Freiburg, 79110, Germany.
Oliver HöhnFraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE, Freiburg, 79110, Germany.
David LacknerFraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE, Freiburg, 79110, Germany.
Carmine PellegrinoFraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE, Freiburg, 79110, Germany.
Jacob J KrichSUNLAB, Nexus for Quantum Technologies Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Alexandre W WalkerQuantum and Nanotechnologies Research Centre, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Karin HinzerSUNLAB, Nexus for Quantum Technologies Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

ERC grant PHASE 101125948Government of Canada's AI for Design National Research Council Collaborative Science, Technology, and Innovation Program INT-014-1Government of Canada's National Research Council HSTN-645National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 497981National Sciences and Engineering Research Research Council of Canada Discovery Research Program RGPIN-2022-03877The German Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01DM21006A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning is proving to be a revolutionary tool across many disciplines, including optoelectronic device design. In this report, we compare classical and machine learning enhanced design optimization methodologies. We investigate, as an example case, the design of the complex structures of ten-junction InP lattice matched photonic power converters with In[Formula: see text]Ga[Formula: see text]As absorbers optimized for operation at 1550 nm. We find that the implicit pattern recognition capabilities of dimensionality reduction using principal component analysis accelerate design discovery, optimization, and the understanding of complex optical phenomena in the simulated devices. The dimensionality reduction approach offers over twenty times as many optimal designs with greater variability and with a 15% reduction in computational cost compared to a classical optimization method. Furthermore, we find that the representation of the reduced dimensionality subspace offers an intuitive interpretation of optical phenomena expected to occur in this design problem. This method is general and offers the potential for knowledge discovery, expanded design perspective, and optimization acceleration in conjunction with a significant reduction in computational expense in systems which can be numerically modeled.

Indexed as

Design discoveryDimensionality reductionKnowledge discoveryMachine learningMulti-junction photonic power convertersOptimization acceleration

Identifiers

PMID41006519
PMCPMC12474909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.