ArticleScientific reports2025
Leveraging multi-modal foundation model image encoders to enhance brain MRI-based headache classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 'Man vs. Machine: can ML algorithms diagnose headaches as accurately as clinicians? A systematic review.'Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Mesocorticolimbic circuitry in episodic migraine: reward- and punishment-related responses and resting-state connectivity.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Large language model agents for biological intelligence across genomics, proteomics, spatial biology, and biomedicine.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Headaches are a nearly universal human experience traditionally diagnosed based solely on symptoms. Recent advances in imaging techniques and artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the development of automated headache detection systems, which can enhance clinical diagnosis, especially when symptom-based evaluations are insufficient. Current AI models often require extensive data, limiting their clinical applicability where data availability is low. However, deep learning models, particularly pre-trained ones and fine-tuned with smaller, targeted datasets can potentially overcome this limitation. By leveraging BioMedCLIP, a pre-trained foundational model combining a vision transformer (ViT) image encoder with PubMedBERT text encoder, we fine-tuned the pre-trained ViT model for the specific purpose of classifying headaches and detecting biomarkers from brain MRI data. The dataset consisted of 721 individuals: 424 healthy controls (HC) from the IXI dataset and 297 local participants, including migraine sufferers (n = 96), individuals with acute post-traumatic headache (APTH, n = 48), persistent post-traumatic headache (PPTH, n = 49), and additional HC (n = 104). The model achieved high accuracy across multiple balanced test sets, including 89.96% accuracy for migraine versus HC, 88.13% for APTH versus HC, and 83.13% for PPTH versus HC, all validated through five-fold cross-validation for robustness. Brain regions identified by Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping analysis as responsible for migraine classification included the postcentral cortex, supramarginal gyrus, superior temporal cortex, and precuneus cortex; for APTH, rostral middle frontal and precentral cortices; and, for PPTH, cerebellar cortex and precentral cortex. To our knowledge, this is the first study to leverage a multimodal biomedical foundation model in the context of headache classification and biomarker detection using structural MRI, offering complementary insights into the causes and brain changes associated with headache disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.