Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006502›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Assessing perception and equity of cultural ecosystem services in urban parks using social media data.

Yu Zhang, Lin Zhao, Shiyuan Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu ZhangSchool of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China. zyhust@whu.edu.cn.
Lin ZhaoSchool of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Shiyuan HuSchool of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China. hushiyuan@whu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific assessment of cultural ecosystem services (CESs) levels in urban parks and refined analysis of their spatial equity are essential for residents' social well-being. However, traditional assessment methods often fail to capture non-material benefits of CESs and tend to homogenize evaluation across different functional services. This study introduced an analytical framework combining geolocated social media data to assess five CESs perception levels. We employed the importance-performance analysis (IPA) method to reveal demand-satisfaction patterns of CESs, and a modified two-step floating catchment area (M2SFCA) method was proposed to measure equity by incorporating perceived accessibility. Through a case study of 115 urban parks in the central area of Wuhan, the results revealed: (1) Comprehensive parks offer higher services level for recreational activities, while community parks provide higher services levels for outdoor workouts; (2) Through the IPA, the characteristics of public demand and optimization directions of diverse functions were identified. Recreational activities emerged as the most extensive and important functions; (3) Significant spatial disparities exist in the accessibility of the five CESs, with notable equity contradiction in supply. The supply-demand imbalance of historical and cultural function is particularly serious. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of social media data in assessing different CESs level, and perceived-enhanced accessibility results offer valuable insights into the equity of CESs. The framework provides actionable insights for planners and policymakers to optimize park management, thereby ensuring more equitable public access to various CESs.

Indexed as

AccessibilityCultural ecosystem services (CESs)Modified two-step floating catchment area method (M2SFCA)Natural language processingSpatial perceptionUrban parks

Identifiers

PMID41006502
PMCPMC12474964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.