ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessing perception and equity of cultural ecosystem services in urban parks using social media data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of road infrastructure in Yerevan, Armenia through the lens of pedestrian and child safety: a school-based analysis.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- How do cultural ecosystem services affect visitor emotions? Evidence from social media data in Shanghai urban parks.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scientific assessment of cultural ecosystem services (CESs) levels in urban parks and refined analysis of their spatial equity are essential for residents' social well-being. However, traditional assessment methods often fail to capture non-material benefits of CESs and tend to homogenize evaluation across different functional services. This study introduced an analytical framework combining geolocated social media data to assess five CESs perception levels. We employed the importance-performance analysis (IPA) method to reveal demand-satisfaction patterns of CESs, and a modified two-step floating catchment area (M2SFCA) method was proposed to measure equity by incorporating perceived accessibility. Through a case study of 115 urban parks in the central area of Wuhan, the results revealed: (1) Comprehensive parks offer higher services level for recreational activities, while community parks provide higher services levels for outdoor workouts; (2) Through the IPA, the characteristics of public demand and optimization directions of diverse functions were identified. Recreational activities emerged as the most extensive and important functions; (3) Significant spatial disparities exist in the accessibility of the five CESs, with notable equity contradiction in supply. The supply-demand imbalance of historical and cultural function is particularly serious. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of social media data in assessing different CESs level, and perceived-enhanced accessibility results offer valuable insights into the equity of CESs. The framework provides actionable insights for planners and policymakers to optimize park management, thereby ensuring more equitable public access to various CESs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.