ArticleScientific reports2025
Improved 3D reconstruction pipeline for enhancing the quality of 3D model generation from multi-view images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 2D-to-3D Image Reconstruction in Agriculture: A Review of Methods, Challenges, and AI-Driven Opportunities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this research, we slightly modify the conventional pipeline such that it (1) sets a minimum triangulation angle of 3°, (2) reduces (and possibly minimizes) overall re-projection error by simultaneously optimizing all camera poses and 3D points in the bundle adjustment step, and (3) uses a tiling buffer size of 1024 × 1024, to generate, from a set of 2D images, a detailed 3D models of complex objects. We systematically showcase the versatility of this improved photogrammetric pipeline by applying it to three datasets - a proprietary dataset (money plant) and two publicly available datasets (a statue and an old computer). To the best of our knowledge, while previous research has employed photogrammetry techniques for 3D model generation, none has systematically defined the 3d reconstruction pipeline, with a focus on underlying mathematical concepts, Additionally, there has been a lack of evaluation of how the quality of input 2D images impacts quality of the resulting 3D models. Our study evaluates the entropy and image quality (using BRISQUE scores) of the 3D model generated in relation to the image quality of the set of input 2D images, providing insights into the reliability of the proposed photogrammetric approach. Despite utilizing a low-quality image dataset as input, we demonstrated that we achieved a high-quality 3D model. Furthermore, we observed less differences in image quality when comparing the 3D model with the original 2D images. Overall, our research contributes to both theoretical understanding and practical application of photogrammetry for 3D reconstruction as experimented on three distinct image datasets. As a future research scope, we provide suggestions for possible parallelization of some of the steps of the 3D reconstruction pipeline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.