Observational studyScientific reports2025
The consequences of traditional cervical cauterization on cervical integrity and pregnancy: a cross-sectional study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This cross-sectional observational study involved 1052 non-pregnant women aged 18-65 who had undergone TCC and sought care at a tertiary-level gynecology clinic. We documented participants' medical histories, Pap smear results, and TCC histories. Pap smear results were analyzed using the 2014 Bethesda classification, and obstetric outcomes, including pregnancies, deliveries, miscarriages, and preterm births (PTD), were evaluated. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. This cross-sectional observational study involved 1052 non-pregnant women aged 18-65 who had undergone TCC and sought care at a tertiary-level gynecology clinic. We documented participants' medical histories, Pap smear results, and TCC histories. Pap smear results were analyzed using the 2014 Bethesda classification, and obstetric outcomes, including pregnancies, deliveries, miscarriages, and preterm births (PTD), were evaluated. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. The mean age of participants was 34.4 ± 7.4 years. Abnormal Pap smear results were observed in 11.5% of patients, with a higher prevalence (29.9%) among those who underwent TCC within the last year. The frequency of TCC was inversely related to the rate of abnormal smear results (p < 0.005). However, frequent TCC procedures were associated with significantly increased rates of abortion (18.9%) and PTD (10.3%) (both p < 0.005). While the time elapsed since the last TCC procedure influenced abortion and PTD rates, both were statistically significant (p = 0.016 and p = 0.029, respectively). TCC is associated with a higher incidence of cervical abnormalities and adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly when performed more frequently. These findings suggest a potential link between TCC and disruptions in cervical health, which may increase the risk of pregnancy complications, underscoring the need for cautious use and further research. Educating communities about the potential risks and advocating for safer medical practices are crucial steps towards improving gynecological and obstetric care in regions where TCC is still prevalent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.