ArticleScientific reports2025
Radiation dose optimisation in paediatric head CT using attenuation-based auto prescription.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attenuation-based ultra-low-dose lung computed tomography at 0.1 mSv to 0.3 mSv effective dose in children.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Relationship between Water-equivalent Diameter, Computed Tomography Dose Indices, and Image Noise in Pediatric Head Computed Tomography Under Active and Inactive Tube Current Modulation.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimizing ionizing radiation is crucial in paediatric imaging due to children's increased radiation sensitivity, especially at younger ages. To evaluate a CT attenuation-based Auto Prescription protocol for paediatric head imaging, testing whether it provides image quality and radiation dose comparable to age-based protocols. Auto Prescription was implemented on a 256-slice scanner for axial volumetric head CT, adjusting kV and mAs based on attenuation data from scout images. Radiation dose parameters (CTDIvol, SSDE, ED, DLP) and image quality metrics (SNR, CNR, subjective Likert scale from 1-unacceptable to 4-higher than needed) were assessed in 79 consecutive studies using Auto Prescription protocols. These were compared to 68 studies obtained with age-based protocols using non-parametric tests. A total of 147 patients (60 females, mean age 6.7 ± 5.1 years) were included. The auto prescription group included 29 patients aged 0-5, 20 aged 5-10, 25 aged 10-15, and 5 over 15 years; the age-based group included 36, 18, 9, and 5 patients respectively in the same age groups. The Auto Prescription protocol achieved a more balanced radiation dose distribution across age and water-equivalent diameter. The greatest dose reduction was observed in the 0-1 year (48.2%, p < 0.001) and 10-15 year (40.4%, p < 0.001) age groups. While diagnostic image quality was adequate in both settings, it was lower with the auto prescription protocols (mean image quality 3.0 ± 0.2 versus 2.8 ± 0.2; SNR 7.2 ± 1.5 vs. 5.1 ± 1.1; CNR 0.9 ± 0.5 vs. 0.7 ± 0.2; all p < 0.001). All subjective image quality parameters were statistically non-inferior to the age- based protocol (p < 0.05). Attenuation-based Auto Prescription resulted in a more homogeneous and head density adapted radiation dose across paediatric patients, with non-inferior image quality. Dose reduction was a secondary benefit of individualized scan settings based on patient attenuation rather than age alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.