Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006422›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

SMOTE-augmented machine learning model predicts recurrent and metastatic breast cancer from microbiome analysis.

Ji Eun Hong, Yeon Eun Kim, Yun Soo Kang, Dong Hyeok Choi, So Hyun Ahn, Jeongshin An

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ji Eun HongDepartment of Medical Science, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yeon Eun KimEwha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yun Soo KangEwha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dong Hyeok ChoiDepartment of Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
So Hyun Ahn *Ewha Medical Research Institute, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. mpsohyun@ewha.ac.kr.
Jeongshin An *Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 1071 Anyangcheon-ro, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, 07985, Republic of Korea. jsan@ewha.ac.kr.

Funding

Korean Association for Women Surgeons 202201770001Ministry of Health and Welfare RS-2023-00262969National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Korean government (MSIT) RS-2021-NR058775National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Korean government (MSIT), RS-2022-NR067387National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Korean government (MSIT), RS-2023-00240003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrence and metastasis of breast cancer (RMBC) have a decisive impact on patient survival, necessitating reliable biomarkers for its early prediction. This study used machine learning to evaluate blood microbiome profiles as predictive biomarkers of RMBC. A retrospective predictive analysis was conducted on 288 participants, including 96 patients with breast cancer and 192 healthy controls. After 7 years of follow-up, patients were classified into disease-free survival (DFS, n = 88) and RMBC (n = 8) groups. Blood microbiome composition was analysed using 16S rRNA sequencing, followed by quality control. The Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) was employed to address class imbalance. Eleven machine learning models were trained using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and k-fold cross-validation, and evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), recall, precision, F1-score, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). Alpha diversity was significantly lower in DFS and RMBC groups than in the healthy control group (p < 0.05), while beta diversity analysis revealed distinct clustering. The random forest achieved an AUROC of 0.94, a recall of 0.81, an F1-score of 0.83, and an MCC of 0.88. Enterobacter, Bacteroides, Klebsiella, and Bifidobacterium were among the key microbial genera predicting RMBC in the top five models. Blood microbiome profiling shows potential as a non-invasive RMBC biomarker. Machine learning effectively distinguished RMBC, warranting further validation.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMachine LearningMicrobiotaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SROC CurveRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBreast cancerMachine learningMetastasisMicrobiomeRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID41006422
PMCPMC12475220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.