ArticleScientific reports2025
SMOTE-augmented machine learning model predicts recurrent and metastatic breast cancer from microbiome analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable Machine Learning for In-Hospital Mortality Prediction in ICU Patients Using First-24-Hour Routine Vital Signs: A SHAP-Based MIMIC-IV Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- In Silico Psycho-Oncology: Understanding Resilience Pathways in Breast Cancer-Determinants of Longitudinal Depression and Quality-of-Life Trajectories.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Automated detection of fetal vascular malperfusion via data augmentation and algorithm improvement.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Risk stratification and determinant identification of high-need, high-cost ICU patients using machine learning: a large-scale retrospective study from a multi-specialty ICU in a tertiary hospital.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram-Based Risk Stratification Model for Moderate-to-High Frequency Workplace Violence Among Chinese Pediatric Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Shifting Determinants of Mortality Risk After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation Identified by Machine Learning.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recurrence and metastasis of breast cancer (RMBC) have a decisive impact on patient survival, necessitating reliable biomarkers for its early prediction. This study used machine learning to evaluate blood microbiome profiles as predictive biomarkers of RMBC. A retrospective predictive analysis was conducted on 288 participants, including 96 patients with breast cancer and 192 healthy controls. After 7 years of follow-up, patients were classified into disease-free survival (DFS, n = 88) and RMBC (n = 8) groups. Blood microbiome composition was analysed using 16S rRNA sequencing, followed by quality control. The Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) was employed to address class imbalance. Eleven machine learning models were trained using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and k-fold cross-validation, and evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), recall, precision, F1-score, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). Alpha diversity was significantly lower in DFS and RMBC groups than in the healthy control group (p < 0.05), while beta diversity analysis revealed distinct clustering. The random forest achieved an AUROC of 0.94, a recall of 0.81, an F1-score of 0.83, and an MCC of 0.88. Enterobacter, Bacteroides, Klebsiella, and Bifidobacterium were among the key microbial genera predicting RMBC in the top five models. Blood microbiome profiling shows potential as a non-invasive RMBC biomarker. Machine learning effectively distinguished RMBC, warranting further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.