ArticleScientific reports2025
Scene image visual layout based on deep encoder-decoder network and visual image attention model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Generating complex scene layouts faces challenges such as cross-modal semantic alignment bias and low efficiency in modeling dynamic spatiotemporal relationships. Existing methods have limitations on physical constraint awareness and real-time performance, which hinder the application of virtual reality and smart cities. To address the three core issues of cross-modal semantic alignment bias, low efficiency in modeling dynamic spatiotemporal relationships, and insufficient physical constraint awareness, this study proposes a framework based on deep encoding-decoding networks and visual graph attention. It introduces overall nested edge detection to optimize multi-scale feature fusion and designs an explicit edge feature modeling strategy to enhance physical constraint awareness. The framework is compared with benchmark methods such as LayoutTransformer and SceneGraphNet on the COCO-Stuff dataset (172,000 annotated images). Intersection-over-Union (IoU) ratio, feature coverage, and energy consumption are compared. The results demonstrate that the model achieved an IoU ratio of 0.82 and a key feature coverage rate of 94.6% in common object context datasets, with a training efficiency improvement of 38% compared with the benchmark method. The energy consumption during the inference phase was controlled at 54.9Wh, and the memory usage was reduced by 19.5%. Real-world scene testing showed that the IoU difference between the generated layout and the preset plan was less than 0.03, with an average score of 9.39 points for manual evaluation (9.43 points for professional designers), and a layout overlap rate below the 4% threshold in dynamic scenes. The model demonstrated near professional design capabilities in 30 subjective evaluations while maintaining a real-time inference speed of 26.94ms, validating the comprehensive advantages in cross-modal alignment, physical constraint perception, and computational efficiency. In summary, the research model optimizes cross-modal semantic consistency, multi-scale dynamic interaction relationship modeling, and complex spatial constraint perception capabilities, providing high-precision and efficient layout generation technology support for virtual reality scene construction and digital design of smart cities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.