Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006416›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Scene image visual layout based on deep encoder-decoder network and visual image attention model.

Zhengyuan Zhang, Yi He, Ping Wang, Xuesong Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhengyuan ZhangCollege of Art and Design, Guangdong University of Science and Technology, Dongguan, 523083, China.
Yi HeCollege of Art and Design, Guangdong University of Science and Technology, Dongguan, 523083, China.
Ping WangCollege of Art and Design, Guangdong University of Science and Technology, Dongguan, 523083, China. wangping102W@163.com.
Xuesong ZhouCollege of Art and Design, Guangdong University of Science and Technology, Dongguan, 523083, China.

Funding

This article is one of the phased research results of the 2024 doctoral research project "Research on the Spiritual Connotation and Design Expression of Zhuang Ethnic Group in the Perspective of AI Intelligence" at Guangdong University of Science and Technology No. GKY-2024BSQDW-79This paper is part of the phased research results of the education and teaching reform Project of "North Guangdong Minority Clothing Innovation Design Research Team" of Guangdong University of Science and Technology No. GKY-2020CQTD-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generating complex scene layouts faces challenges such as cross-modal semantic alignment bias and low efficiency in modeling dynamic spatiotemporal relationships. Existing methods have limitations on physical constraint awareness and real-time performance, which hinder the application of virtual reality and smart cities. To address the three core issues of cross-modal semantic alignment bias, low efficiency in modeling dynamic spatiotemporal relationships, and insufficient physical constraint awareness, this study proposes a framework based on deep encoding-decoding networks and visual graph attention. It introduces overall nested edge detection to optimize multi-scale feature fusion and designs an explicit edge feature modeling strategy to enhance physical constraint awareness. The framework is compared with benchmark methods such as LayoutTransformer and SceneGraphNet on the COCO-Stuff dataset (172,000 annotated images). Intersection-over-Union (IoU) ratio, feature coverage, and energy consumption are compared. The results demonstrate that the model achieved an IoU ratio of 0.82 and a key feature coverage rate of 94.6% in common object context datasets, with a training efficiency improvement of 38% compared with the benchmark method. The energy consumption during the inference phase was controlled at 54.9Wh, and the memory usage was reduced by 19.5%. Real-world scene testing showed that the IoU difference between the generated layout and the preset plan was less than 0.03, with an average score of 9.39 points for manual evaluation (9.43 points for professional designers), and a layout overlap rate below the 4% threshold in dynamic scenes. The model demonstrated near professional design capabilities in 30 subjective evaluations while maintaining a real-time inference speed of 26.94ms, validating the comprehensive advantages in cross-modal alignment, physical constraint perception, and computational efficiency. In summary, the research model optimizes cross-modal semantic consistency, multi-scale dynamic interaction relationship modeling, and complex spatial constraint perception capabilities, providing high-precision and efficient layout generation technology support for virtual reality scene construction and digital design of smart cities.

Indexed as

Computer visionCross-modal semantic alignmentDeep encoder-decoder networkHolistically-nested edge detectionImage layoutPhysical constraint perceptionVisual graph attention network

Identifiers

PMID41006416
PMCPMC12474947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.