Observational studyScientific reports2025
Long-term outcomes according to birth weight after full-term pregnancy: a nationwide cohort study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Joint Associations of Maternal Smoking and Pre-Pregnancy BMI with Term Low Birthweight and Small-for-Gestational-Age Births: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of 2024 United States Birth Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Pre-Pregnancy BMI and Gestational Weight Gain Have Independent Associations with Birth Weight: A Prospective Cohort Study in Mongolia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Birth weight (BW) is a key determinant of neonatal health, with deviations from the normal range potentially influencing long-term outcomes. We examined the association between BW and long-term outcomes in neonates based on BW after full-term pregnancy. This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed data from the Korea National Health Insurance claims database. Long-term adverse outcomes, including neurological or neurodevelopmental outcomes, were assessed based on prespecified diagnoses, with follow-ups on all neonates. In total, 514,166 mother-infant pairs were included in the study. The rates of neurological or neurodevelopmental delay in the groups with BWs between the 50 and 75th percentiles (controls), below the 3rd percentile, and above the 97th percentile were 14.5, 17.9, and 16.0%, respectively. Compared with the control group, the groups with BWs below the 3rd percentile and in the 3-5, 5-10, 95-97, and > 97th percentiles had adjusted hazard ratios of 1.24 (95% confidence interval: 1.20-1.28), 1.10 (1.05-1.15), 1.10 (1.06-1.13), 1.05 (0.98-1.12), and 1.09 (1.03-1.15), respectively. The relationship between neonatal BW and neurological or neurodevelopmental delays followed a J-shaped distribution, indicating that infants at both extremes of BW were at an increased risk for these delays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.