ArticleScientific reports2025
Indoor WiFi fingerprint localization based on dual population PSO of stacked autoencoder and multi label classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
WiFi fingerprinting has become a widely adopted solution for indoor localization due to its low deployment cost and wide availability. However, its positioning accuracy is often unsatisfactory, especially in complex environments involving multiple floors and buildings, where signal interference and structural complexity significantly degrade localization performance. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a deep neural network (DNN) framework that integrates a Stacked Autoencoder (SAE) for feature extraction and a multi-label classification strategy for accurate localization using received signal strength (RSS) data. To optimize the model parameters effectively in high-dimensional spaces, we introduce a Dual-Swarm Particle Swarm Optimization (DSPSO) algorithm. Unlike conventional PSO, which is prone to premature convergence, DSPSO partitions the particle population into two distinct sub-swarms with adaptive update mechanisms to enhance global exploration and avoid local optima. Experimental evaluations on seven 100-dimensional benchmark functions demonstrate that DSPSO outperforms traditional PSO and recent algorithms like the Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA), achieving the global optimum in four cases. When applied to the WiFi localization task, the DSPSO-optimized SAE-DNN model achieves an average positioning error of 9.42 m-representing 13.74% improvement over the Support Vector Regression (SVR) model and 24.03% improvement over the non-optimized version. Furthermore, the model achieves 100% accuracy in building identification and 92.97% accuracy in floor prediction, proving its effectiveness in multi-building, multi-floor indoor localization scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.