ArticleScientific reports2025
An enhanced opposition-based African vulture optimizer for solving engineering design problems and global optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Modified Multi-Strategy Dhole Optimization Algorithm and Its Engineering Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An enhanced opposition-based African vulture optimizer for solving engineering design problems and global optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
By combining opposition-based learning techniques with conventional African Vulture Optimization (AVO), this study offers a notable improvement in the handling of optimization problems. Despite the limitations of AVO, such as issues involving extremely rough search spaces, more iterations or function evaluations are necessary. To overcome this limitation, our proposed paper, an enhanced opposition-based learning (EOBL), speeds up the convergence and, at the same time, assists the algorithm in escaping local optima. A combination of this new technique with AVO, the Enhanced Opposition-based African Vulture Optimizer (EOBAVO), is proposed. The performance of the suggested EOBAVO was evaluated through experiments using the CEC2005 and CEC2022 benchmark functions in addition to seven engineering challenges. Furthermore, statistical analyses, including the t-test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test, were conducted, and they demonstrated that the proposed EOBAVO surpasses several of the leading algorithms currently in use. The results indicate that the proposed approach can be regarded as a competent and efficient solution for complex optimization challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.