Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006396›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An enhanced opposition-based African vulture optimizer for solving engineering design problems and global optimization.

Henry Blankson, Vanisree Chandran, Himadri Lala, Prabhujit Mohapatra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henry BlanksonDepartment of Mathematics, SAS, VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India.
Vanisree ChandranDepartment of Mathematics, SAS, VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India.
Himadri LalaSchool of Electrical Engineering, VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India. lalacemk@gmail.com.
Prabhujit MohapatraDepartment of CSE, SRM University-AP, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By combining opposition-based learning techniques with conventional African Vulture Optimization (AVO), this study offers a notable improvement in the handling of optimization problems. Despite the limitations of AVO, such as issues involving extremely rough search spaces, more iterations or function evaluations are necessary. To overcome this limitation, our proposed paper, an enhanced opposition-based learning (EOBL), speeds up the convergence and, at the same time, assists the algorithm in escaping local optima. A combination of this new technique with AVO, the Enhanced Opposition-based African Vulture Optimizer (EOBAVO), is proposed. The performance of the suggested EOBAVO was evaluated through experiments using the CEC2005 and CEC2022 benchmark functions in addition to seven engineering challenges. Furthermore, statistical analyses, including the t-test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test, were conducted, and they demonstrated that the proposed EOBAVO surpasses several of the leading algorithms currently in use. The results indicate that the proposed approach can be regarded as a competent and efficient solution for complex optimization challenges.

Indexed as

African vulture optimizerEnhanced opposition-based learningMetaheuristicRandom opposition-based learning

Identifiers

PMID41006396
PMCPMC12475243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.