ArticleScientific reports2025
An open source platform to automate the design, verification, and manufacture of 3D printed microfluidic devices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated Flushing System for Post-Processing in Microfluidic Device Fabrication.Micromachines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microfluidic devices, including lab-on-a-chip devices, have many advantages over conventional laboratory techniques. Although common in some applications, there are several barriers to wider adoption, including the high initial cost to fabricate a design and the labor-intensive process of development. This work seeks to address those barriers by combining 3D printing and computer aided design tools. Building on existing open-source software from electronic design automation (EDA), we present a design, verification, and manufacturing toolchain for 3D design for microfluidic devices. The process starts with a list of components and connections then, automatically lays out a microfluidic device using a library of components, simulates the device, and produces a 3D CAD file that is used for DLP 3D printing process. The automated design and fabrication process was demonstrated by automatically designing and fabricating a calcium quantification assay. This toolchain automatically generated a microfluidic chip that meters each reagent with an error of less than 2.24% as verified by Xyce simulation of the chip. Physical chips were printed and found to perform with errors less than 9.2% on average compared to the assay performed by hand. The demonstration showed the ability of the toolchain to automatically generate a functional microfluidic chip for use with real assays using previously developed EDA tools.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.