ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on intelligent regulation of layered water injection based on reinforcement learning SAC algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Water injection is a key technology to maintain oil reservoir pressure and guarantee high and stable oilfield production. In this paper, we propose an intelligent control method based on reinforcement learning for layered water injection columns, which achieves accurate control by constructing a layered water injection model and algorithm. A water injection column flow model incorporating the structure of the water injection device, column pressure loss, and flow characteristics is established, and the intelligent control system is designed by combining it with the SAC algorithm. The training environment and simulation platform are built using PyTorch, and the performance of SAC, PPO, and DDPG algorithms are compared and verified in different water injection sections. The experimental results show that the average regulation error of the SAC algorithm under the 5% error threshold is only 5%, significantly better than PPO's 37%; the qualified rate of regulation reaches 81%, which is much higher than PPO's 45% and DDPG's 60%; the average number of adjustment steps is 42% fewer than PPO's and 28% fewer than DDPG's; SAC algorithm exhibits more substantial stability and adaptability under complex working conditions, and its regulation accuracy, qualified rate and response speed are better than that of PPO and DDPG. This study provides theoretical support for intelligent layered water injection technology, which has significant reference value for improving the development efficiency of oilfields. Our code will be available online at: https://github.com/HJZ-hub/SACIntelligentLayeredWaterInjection .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.