ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of best housekeeping gene for normalization in qRT-PCR data under different development stages and stress conditions in Vigna mungo.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Screening and Stability Validation of RT-qPCR Reference Genes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The qRT-PCR has emerged as the most sought-after local gene expression profiling technique. The absolute quantification of the mRNA is highly affected by the handling artifacts. In this regard, the internal control genes serve a vital role in negating the handling errors. So far, the most stable housekeeping genes to be used for the normalization of qRT-PCR data are lacking in V. mungo, commonly known as urdbean or blackgram. Therefore, in the current study we aimed to explore the stability of the UFO, TUB2, ACT2, RHA, ISTL6, CyP, DNAJ, RBCS3B, RPS34, USP21, USB1, EfTu, UBQ10, and UBQE9 genes of V. mungo in 17 different developmental stages and 4 different abiotic stresses. The well-acknowledged algorithms such as geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, the comparative ΔCt method and comprehensive RefFinder were used to assess the expression stability. According to the comprehensive ranking, RPS34 and RHA were identified as the most appropriate genes for qRT-PCR data normalization throughout all developmental stages, whereas ACT2 and RPS34 were optimal under abiotic stress conditions. Further, the suitability of these three candidate housekeeping genes for normalization has been demonstrated in an independent experiment. Based on the findings obtained, the present research advocates the use of a combination of HKGs (RPS34 and RHA for developing tissues and ACT2 and RPS34 for stress-treated tissues) for the normalization of qRT-PCR data. The proposed reference genes will guarantee the reliability and consistency of qRT-PCR results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.