ArticleScientific reports2025
Diagnostic applicability of the circulating growth factors in preeclampsia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maternal Endocrine and Vascular Perturbations Reprogram the Transcriptomic and Secretory Profile of Perinatal Stem Cells: A Comparative Study of Umbilical Cord-Derived Stem Cell UC-MSCs and Human Milk-Derived Stem Cell MM-MSCs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A Narrative Review of Recent Insights on Nerve Growth Factor Signaling in Physiological and Pathological Ovarian Processes in Mammals.Biomolecules · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the levels of various growth factors in maternal serum and umbilical vein serum between individuals with preeclampsia (PE) and those with normotensive pregnancies. One hundred eight pregnant women were enrolled in this prospective study. Blood samples were taken at third trimester. 67 serum samples of preeclampsia and 41 normotensive mothers were collected. Umbilical vein serum samples of 27 preeclampsia and 38 normotensive pregnancies were collected. Serum levels of BDNF, EGF, FGF-2, HGF, LIF, NGF-beta, PDGF-BB, PlGF-1, SCF, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A and D were measured. EGF, HGF, LIF, and SCF levels were significantly higher in PE compared to normotensive group after adjustment for gestational age. There were no differences in growth factors in umbilical vein serum between two groups. EGF, NGF-beta and SCF were associated with the elevation of systolic and diastolic blood pressure. SCF showed a positive correlation with ALT and creatinine and a decreasing trend as gestational age advances. The ROC curve revealed cutoff value of 36.6 pg/mL in EGF, 23.5 in HGF, 2.78 in LIF and 2.95 in SCF (p < 0.001, p = 0.042, p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Circulating growth factors in PE may be responsible for development or consequence associated with the pathogenesis in PE especially elevated EGF, HGF, LIF and SCF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.