ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimized YOLO based model for photovoltaic defect detection in electroluminescence images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photovoltaic Cell Surface Defect Detection Based on Wavelet-Aware Perception and Selective Reconstruction.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Real-Time Interface-Opening Detection for Nickel Starting Sheet Pre-Stripping Based on an Improved YOLO11n.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- GHM-DEIM: An Improved DEIM-Based Framework for Subtle and Scale-Variant Thermal Anomaly Detection in Photovoltaic UAV Infrared Imagery.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Photovoltaic Cell Defect Classification: A Systematic Comparison of LoRA, QLoRA, and Full Fine-Tuning on ConvNeXt-Tiny.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- MSW-Mamba-Det: Multi-Scale Windowed State-Space Modeling for End-to-End Defect Detection in Photovoltaic Module Electroluminescence Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ensuring the reliability of photovoltaic (PV) systems requires efficient defect detection to maintain optimal energy production. Deep learning-based object detection models have demonstrated remarkable performance in automating this process. In this study, PV-YOLOv12n is introduced as an optimized variant of YOLOv12n, tailored for defect detection in electroluminescence (EL) images of PV panels. The modifications incorporate an A2C2f module at the P5 scale (1024, True), which enhances feature extraction by prioritizing critical defect regions. This improvement significantly boosts recall and precision for detecting large cracks, significant dislocations, and widespread material inconsistencies. Experimental results on the PVEL-AD and Roboflow datasets demonstrate superior detection performance. PV-YOLOv12n achieves a mAP@50 of 0.91 on both datasets, surpassing the baseline YOLOv12n (mAP@50 of 0.90 and 0.88 for PVEL-AD and Roboflow, respectively). Additionally, mAP@50-95 increases to 0.58 on PVEL-AD and 0.75 on Roboflow, highlighting improved generalization. Despite these improvements, inference speed remains efficient at 4.24 ms for PVEL-AD and 4.43 ms for Roboflow, ensuring suitability for real-time applications. These results validate the effectiveness of PV-YOLOv12n in detecting critical PV panel defects, supporting its deployment in large-scale solar farm inspections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.