Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006334›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2025

Data-driven inference of Boolean networks from transcriptomes to predict cellular differentiation and reprogramming.

Stéphanie Chevalier, Julia Becker, Yujuan Gui, Vincent Noël, Cui Su, Sascha Jung, Laurence Calzone, Andrei Zinovyev, Antonio Del Sol, Jun Pang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Stéphanie ChevalierTranslational Medicine, Servier, Suresnes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9060-6863
Julia BeckerUniv. Luxembourg, Department of Life Sciences and Medicine, 6 avenue du Swing, L-4367 Belvaux, Luxembourg, France.
Yujuan GuiUniv. Luxembourg, Department of Life Sciences and Medicine, 6 avenue du Swing, L-4367 Belvaux, Luxembourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4244-1587
Vincent NoëlInstitut Curie, Université PSL, F-75005, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3448-291X
Cui SuUniv. Luxembourg, Department of Computer Science, 6 avenue de la Fonte, L-4364, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Sascha JungComputational Biology Group, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University10 of Luxembourg, L-4362, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3488-409X
Laurence CalzoneInstitut Curie, Université PSL, F-75005, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7835-1148
Andrei ZinovyevIn silico R&D, Evotec, Toulouse, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9517-7284
Antonio Del SolComputational Biology Group, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University10 of Luxembourg, L-4362, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9926-617X
Jun PangUniv. Luxembourg, Department of Computer Science, 6 avenue de la Fonte, L-4364, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4521-4112
Lasse SinkkonenUniv. Luxembourg, Department of Life Sciences and Medicine, 6 avenue du Swing, L-4367 Belvaux, Luxembourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4223-3027
Thomas SauterUniv. Luxembourg, Department of Life Sciences and Medicine, 6 avenue du Swing, L-4367 Belvaux, Luxembourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8225-2954
Loïc PaulevéUniv. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, LaBRI, UMR 5800, F-33400, Talence, France. loic.pauleve@labri.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7219-2027

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-16-CE12-0034Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg INTER/ANR/15/11191283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Boolean networks provide robust, explainable, and predictive models of cellular dynamics, especially for cellular differentiation and fate decision processes. Yet, the construction of such models is extremely challenging, as it requires integrating prior knowledge with experimental observation of the transcriptome, potentially relating thousands of genes. We present a general methodology for integrating transcriptome data and prior knowledge on the underlying gene regulatory network in order to generate automatically ensembles of Boolean networks able to reproduce the modeled qualitative behavior. Our methodology builds on the software BoNesis, which implements the automatic construction of Boolean networks from a specification of their expected structural and dynamical properties. We show how to transform transcriptome data into such a qualitative specification, and then how to exploit the generated ensembles of Boolean networks for identifying families of candidate models, and for predicting robust cellular reprogramming targets. We illustrate the scalability and versatility of our overall approach with two applications: the modeling of hematopoiesis from single-cell RNA-Seq data, and modeling the differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells into adipocytes and osteoblasts from bulk RNA-seq time series data. For this latter case, we took advantage of ensemble modeling to predict combinations of reprogramming factors for trans-differentiation that are robust to model uncertainties due to variations in experimental replicates and choice of binarization method. Moreover, we performed an in silico assessment of the fidelity and efficiency of the reprogramming and conducted preliminary experimental validation.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingComputational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksTranscriptomeAdipocytesAlgorithmsAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingHematopoiesisHumansMiceOsteoblastsSingle-Cell AnalysisSoftware

Identifiers

PMID41006334
PMCPMC12475257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.