Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006308›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Wordsworth: A generative word dataset for comparison of speech representations in humans and neural networks.

Yunkai Zhu, Cameron Grier, Amy Garcia, Dylan Pearson, Christian Gibson, Odelia Schwartz, Andrew R Dykstra

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yunkai ZhuSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. yunkai.zhu@ucf.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0868-3574
Cameron GrierSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Amy GarciaSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Dylan PearsonSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Christian GibsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Odelia SchwartzDepartment of Computer Science, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Andrew R DykstraSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8075-6374

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech perception is fundamental for human communication, but its neural basis is not well understood. Furthermore, while modern neural networks (NNs) can accurately recognize speech, whether they effectively model human speech processing remains unclear. Here, we introduce Wordsworth, a dataset designed to facilitate comparisons of speech representations between artificial and biological NNs. We synthesised 1,200 tokens for each of 84 monosyllabic words while controlling for acoustic parameters such as amplitude, duration, and background noise, thus encouraging the use of phonetic features known to be important for speech perception. Human listening experiments showed that Wordsworth tokens are intelligible. Additional experiments using convolutional NNs showed (i) that Wordsworth tokens were recognizable and (ii) that error patterns could be at least partially explained by acoustic phonetics. The control with which tokens were created permits end users to manipulate them in whatever ways might be useful for their purposes. Finally, a subset of tokens specifically for human neuroscience experiments was also created, with precise and known distributions of amplitude, onset, and offset times.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerSpeechSpeech PerceptionHumansPhonetics

Identifiers

PMID41006308
PMCPMC12475094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.