Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006287›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

InfEHR: Clinical phenotype resolution through deep geometric learning on electronic health records.

Justin Kauffman, Emma Holmes, Akhil Vaid, Alexander W Charney, Patricia Kovatch, Joshua Lampert, Ankit Sakhuja, Marinka Zitnik, Benjamin S Glicksberg, Ira Hofer and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Justin KauffmanThe Windreich Department of Artificial Intelligence and Human Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA.
Emma HolmesThe Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine at Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.
Akhil VaidThe Windreich Department of Artificial Intelligence and Human Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3343-744X
Alexander W CharneyThe Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine at Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8135-6858
Patricia KovatchThe Windreich Department of Artificial Intelligence and Human Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8368-1742
Joshua LampertThe Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine at Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0081-0356
Ankit SakhujaThe Windreich Department of Artificial Intelligence and Human Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA.
Marinka ZitnikBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8530-7228
Benjamin S GlicksbergThe Windreich Department of Artificial Intelligence and Human Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4515-8090
Ira HoferThe Windreich Department of Artificial Intelligence and Human Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA.
Girish N NadkarniThe Windreich Department of Artificial Intelligence and Human Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA. girish.nadkarni@mountsinai.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6319-4314

Funding

Conduits: Mount Sinai Health System Translational Science HubUL1TR004419 · NCATS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Rosalind J Wright · 2022 to 2026
$46.4M
COVID and Translational Science supercomputer (CATS)S10OD030463 · OD · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI KOVATCH, PATRICIA · 2021 to 2021
$2.0M
Big Omics Data Engine 2 SupercomputerS10OD026880 · OD · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI KOVATCH, PATRICIA · 2019 to 2019
$2.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR004419NIH HHS S10 OD026880NIH HHS S10 OD030463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic health records contain multimodal data that can inform clinical decisions but are often unsuited for advanced machine learning analyses due to lack of labeled data. Here, we present InfEHR, a framework to automatically compute clinical likelihoods from whole electronic health records without requiring large volumes of labeled training data. InfEHR applies deep geometric learning through a procedure that converts whole electronic health records to temporal graphs that naturally capture phenotypic dynamics, leading to unbiased representations. Using only few labeled examples, InfEHR computes and automatically revises probabilities achieving highly performant inferences, especially in low-prevalence diseases. We test InfEHR using electronic health records from Mount Sinai Health System and UC Irvine Medical Center against physician-provided heuristics on neonatal culture-negative sepsis (3% prevalence) and postoperative acute kidney injury (21% prevalence). InfEHR demonstrated superior performance: for culture-negative sepsis (sensitivity: 0.60 vs. 0.04, specificity: 0.98 vs. 0.99) and post-operative acute kidney injury (sensitivity: 0.71 vs. 0.20, specificity: 0.93 vs. 0.98). Our study demonstrates the application of geometric deep learning in electronic health records for probabilistic inference in real-world clinical settings at scale.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElectronic Health RecordsAcute Kidney InjuryHumansInfant, NewbornPhenotypeSepsis

Identifiers

PMID41006287
PMCPMC12475164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.