ArticleNature communications2025
InfEHR: Clinical phenotype resolution through deep geometric learning on electronic health records.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning, Large Language Models, and Multimodal AI for Diagnosing Pediatric Rare Diseases: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for pediatric rare disease diagnosis: a multimethod study integrating published evidence and clinician interviews.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- AI-powered Chatbot integration for enhanced accessibility of electronic health records in a pediatric hospital.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Data-Driven Culture in Medicine and Surgery: Policy Pathways to Learning Health Systems.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electronic health records contain multimodal data that can inform clinical decisions but are often unsuited for advanced machine learning analyses due to lack of labeled data. Here, we present InfEHR, a framework to automatically compute clinical likelihoods from whole electronic health records without requiring large volumes of labeled training data. InfEHR applies deep geometric learning through a procedure that converts whole electronic health records to temporal graphs that naturally capture phenotypic dynamics, leading to unbiased representations. Using only few labeled examples, InfEHR computes and automatically revises probabilities achieving highly performant inferences, especially in low-prevalence diseases. We test InfEHR using electronic health records from Mount Sinai Health System and UC Irvine Medical Center against physician-provided heuristics on neonatal culture-negative sepsis (3% prevalence) and postoperative acute kidney injury (21% prevalence). InfEHR demonstrated superior performance: for culture-negative sepsis (sensitivity: 0.60 vs. 0.04, specificity: 0.98 vs. 0.99) and post-operative acute kidney injury (sensitivity: 0.71 vs. 0.20, specificity: 0.93 vs. 0.98). Our study demonstrates the application of geometric deep learning in electronic health records for probabilistic inference in real-world clinical settings at scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.