ArticleScientific reports2025
Individualized prediction tool for patients with metastatic gastric signet cell carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in female gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma: a SEER database analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric signet cell carcinoma (GSRC) is a special type of gastric cancer. Due to its high metastatic rate patients usually have a poor prognosis. Accurately predicting the survival time of these patients and selecting the best treatment strategy are urgent clinical questions. All patients included in the study were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The demographic and clinical information of these patients was subjected to Cox regression analysis using SPSS software. The risk factors that were subsequently screened were used to construct and validate the nomogram through R software. A total of 1003 patients were included in this study. After Cox regression analysis, six variables (T stage, surgery status, chemotherapy, metastases status of bone, liver and lung) were identified as risk factors that independently influenced the patients' prognosis. These variables were used to construct a nomogram, which was shown to have good predictive power by receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration curves. The AUC values for 3-, 6-, and 12-month OS prediction were 0.845, 0.793, and 0.751 in the training cohort, and 0.800, 0.735, and 0.693 in the validation cohort and decision curve analysis indicating that this nomogram could result in a good clinical benefit for the patient. We have successfully developed and validated a nomogram that accurately predicts 3-, 6- and 12-month overall survival in patients with metastatic GSRC. This can provide a theoretical basis for clinical practice and help clinicians to choose the best treatment strategy for their patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.