ArticleNature communications2025
Comparison of imaging based single-cell resolution spatial transcriptomics profiling platforms using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Enhancing RNA Capture Efficiency in Spatial Transcriptomics: A Review of Innovative Technologies and Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Spatial Transcriptomics As Rasterized Image Tensors (STARIT) characterizes cell states with subcellular molecular heterogeneity.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Single-cell mass spectrometry imaging: platform advances for multimodal spatial omics.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- From descriptive to generative: foundation-model approaches for spatial transcriptomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Spatial ecotype in tumor immune exclusion: from spatial architecture to therapeutic strategies.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Review
- Single-cell spatial transcriptomics of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded biopsies reveals colitis-associated cell networks.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Review
- Standardized metrics for assessment and reproducibility of imaging-based spatial transcriptomics datasets.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Clonal Metamorphosis: Deconstructing MPN Evolution with Single-Cell and Spatial Multi-Omics.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- HistoMap: Reconstructing Spatially Resolved Single-Cell Profiles from Bulk RNA-Seq to Decipher the Immune-Excluded Microenvironment in Colon Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
- Review
- Spatial transcriptomics atlas of inflammatory bowel disease to guide implementation in research consortiums and clinical trials.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Reconstructing biologically coherent cellular profiles from imaging-based spatial transcriptomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- February in focus in HCB: spatial transcriptomics.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026Article
- The Evolution of Spatial Omics Technologies Introduces A Novel Avenue for Lung Cancer Research.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Spatial multiomics to inform immunocytokine engineering: knowledge base, gaps, and QC solutions.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Modeling macrophage-T cell interactions in the breast cancer immune microenvironment: from spatial omics to functional validation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
- Update of
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Imaging-based spatial transcriptomics (ST) is evolving as a pivotal technology in studying tumor biology and associated microenvironments. However, the strengths of the commercially available ST platforms in studying spatial biology have not been systematically evaluated using rigorously controlled experiments. We use serial 5 μm sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma and pleural mesothelioma samples in tissue microarrays to compare the performance of the ST platforms (CosMx, MERFISH, and Xenium (uni/multi-modal)) in reference to bulk RNA sequencing, multiplex immunofluorescence, GeoMx, and hematoxylin and eosin staining data. In addition to an objective assessment of automatic cell segmentation and phenotyping, we perform a manual phenotyping evaluation to assess pathologically meaningful comparisons between ST platforms. Here, we show the intricate differences between the ST platforms, reveal the importance of parameters such as probe design in determining the data quality, and suggest reliable workflows for accurate spatial profiling and molecular discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.