Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006216›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

The zebra finch auditory cortex reconstructs occluded syllables in conspecific song.

Bao Le, Margot C Bjoring, C Daniel Meliza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bao LeDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Margot C BjoringDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8868-1714
C Daniel MelizaDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. cdm8j@virginia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9395-4369

Funding

Experience-dependent plasticity of auditory processing for vocal communicationR01DC018621 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI MELIZA, CHAD DANIEL · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
National Science Foundation (NSF) IOS-1942480NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018621U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 1R01-DC018621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the perceptual illusion known as phonemic (or auditory) restoration, when part of a word is deleted and replaced by noise, listeners still hear the complete word. The neural mechanisms that create this illusion by generating predictions of missing information remain poorly understood. Zebra finches (Taeniopygia castanotis) use song, a sequence of complex vocal elements, to communicate in noisy social environments. Here, we found that in anesthetized finches, populations of single units in the homolog of auditory cortex respond to songs in which the original audio of an element is completely replaced by noise as if the missing element were present alongside the noise, despite only noise being physically present. This occurs even for songs birds have never heard, but not if the context is masked or lacks species-typical syntax. These results suggest that local neural dynamics instantiate a general model of conspecific song that biases auditory responses to restore missing information.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAuditory PerceptionFinchesVocalization, AnimalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsFemaleMaleNoise

Identifiers

PMID41006216
PMCPMC12475082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.