Trial reportEuropean urology2026
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for High-risk Localized Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Final Long-term Outcomes from a Phase 2 Clinical Trial and an Expanded Cohort.
Trial report in European urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occult pT2-4 disease and postoperative loss of full-dose cisplatin eligibility in CT-staged cT≤1/cN0 upper tract urothelial carcinoma.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: interpreting durable long-term outcomes in a changing treatment landscape.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Modern management of locally advanced urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Comparative insights into upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Aligning Chinese Urological Association and European Association of Urology guidelines with clinical practice.Asian journal of urology · 2026Article
- Clinical Trials and Emerging Therapeutic Paradigms in Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.Cancers · 2026Review
- Diagnostic uncertainty of clinical T2 disease and its impact on treatment stratification in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Validation of the diagnostic accuracy of a urine-based DNA methylation marker test in patients with upper urinary tract lesions.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Management and Treatment Strategies for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Insights.Research and reports in urology · 2026Review
- Disitamab vedotin combined with PD-1 inhibitors for postoperative adjuvant therapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective exploratory case series.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk upper tract urothelial cancer.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We previously reported results from a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 trial that demonstrated a pathologic response rate (<ypT2N0) of 63% among 57 patients with high-risk nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) comprising gemcitabine and split-dose cisplatin. Here we report updated long-term oncologic outcomes. Outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS, non-urothelial recurrence or death from UTUC), cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and bladder recurrence-free survival (B-RFS), stratified by pathologic response to NAC in the trial cohort alone (primary analysis) and in an expanded cohort including 69 additional patients (total n = 126) with high-risk nonmetastatic UTUC who received NAC followed by definitive surgery at our institution (secondary analysis). Median follow-up among surviving trial patients was 5.4 yr (interquartile range 4.6-7.5), during which 20 DFS, 11 CSS, and 18 OS events occurred. Estimated 7-yr survival rates were 60% for DFS, 77% for CSS, and 72% for OS. Responders to NAC experienced superior 7-yr DFS (78% vs 31%; log-rank p < 0.001), CSS (90% vs 56%; log-rank p = 0.002), and OS (87% vs 48%; log-rank p < 0.001). Findings were similar in the expanded cohort of 126 patients treated with NAC. B-RFS was not associated with response to NAC. These data support incorporation of NAC in the treatment paradigm for high-risk nonmetastatic UTUC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41006098What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.