ReviewThe oncologist2025
Clinical perspective on management of key adverse events with sacituzumab govitecan.
Review in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Pharmacotherapeutic Properties and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Oncology: Principles, Clinical Development, and Future Directions.MedComm · 2026Review
- Drug-specific safety signal prioritization of antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: integrating FAERS pharmacovigilance, machine learning, and clinical contextualization.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer: Therapeutic-Window Engineering, Tumor Heterogeneity, and Immunotherapy Combinations.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Application of antibody-drug conjugates in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: mechanisms, treatment-related adverse events, and management strategies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- A Patient-Led Survey of Antibody Drug Conjugate Usage and Dosing for People Living With Metastatic Breast Cancer.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a first-in-class trophoblast cell surface antigen-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate that selectively delivers a well-characterized and potent payload of SN-38 to cancer cells and the surrounding environment. In the United States, SG is indicated for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (immunohistochemistry 0, 1+, or 2+/in situ hybridization-negative) breast cancer (HR+/HER2- BC). Real-world management of SG-related adverse events can vary widely from clinical studies. Therefore, it is vital to provide clinicians with first-hand experience to aid in the management and support of patients before treatment initiation. In clinical studies (IMMU-132-01, ASCENT, TROPiCS-02, and TROPHY-U-01), the pooled incidence of key adverse events was 61% for neutropenia, 64% for diarrhea, 51% for fatigue, and 45% for alopecia. Here, we discuss the incidence of neutropenia, diarrhea, fatigue, and alopecia associated with SG treatment and provide recommendations on their management based on established guidelines and personal clinical experience. We also discuss important risk factors such as UGT1A1 polymorphism and advanced age (eg, ≥65 years). From our practical experience, we present a case of a patient with TNBC experiencing neutropenia and diarrhea, and another with HR+/HER2- BC experiencing diarrhea. Our review provides practicing oncologists considering SG therapy important information regarding its safe and appropriate use in real-world settings to maximize clinical benefit for patients with locally advanced or metastatic TNBC and HR+/HER2- BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.