ArticleJACC. Case reports2025
Coronary Artery Vasculitis: A Nightmare Complicating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-Cell Transcriptomics Reveals the Immune Pathogenesis of Isolated Coronary Arteritis Presenting as Refractory In-Stent Restenosis.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2026Article
- Coronary periarteritis as a rare cause of angina in a runner: hybrid PET/CT findings.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Chest Discomfort: Could Coronary Pathology Extend Beyond Atherosclerosis?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary artery vasculitis (CAV) is a relatively rare etiology of coronary artery disease (CAD), which could lead to recurrent complications once treated with coronary stents. However, differentiating between CAV and atherosclerotic CAD is challenging. CASE SUMMARY: Included in this case series were 10 symptomatic patients who were initially considered as having atherosclerotic CAD but were eventually diagnosed with CAV at our center from August 2021 to October 2024. We describe the clinical and imaging characteristics of these patients. DISCUSSION: This case series shows several classic CAV characteristics on coronary computed tomography angiography, raising the awareness of CAV misdiagnosis and highlighting the importance of timely order and dedicated imaging analysis for the diagnosis of CAV. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Coronary computed tomography angiography can provide comprehensive information on plaque characteristics, coronary artery wall abnormalities, and pericoronary inflammation, which can help cardiologists and radiologists differentiate between CAV and atherosclerotic CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.