ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Improving the compliance of orthopaedic wrist and hand referrals against the musculoskeletal recommendations from the 2018 Evidence-based Interventions programme, along with local guidance in Greater Manchester: A quality improvement project.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe National Health Service Long-Term Workforce Plan calls for improving clinical pathways for surgery. Four wrist and hand surgeries, including carpal tunnel syndrome release, Dupuytren's contracture release, ganglion excision and trigger finger release, are described as procedures of limited clinical value and are included in the 2018 Evidence-based Interventions programme, as well as local guidance in Greater Manchester (GM). LOCAL PROBLEM: A pre-scoping exercise audit at a single musculoskeletal service in GM conducted from May 2021 to June 2023 highlighted that clinician compliance rates for these referrals were 15% below the service provider's internal national average and 25% below the service provider's internal national target, demonstrating the need for a quality improvement project.
methodsThe Model for Improvement was implemented using four Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. These cycles were executed over 14 weeks and aimed to improve compliance through educational sessions, clinical resources, interactive learning and practical tools.
interventionThe project comprised four PDSA cycles: PDSA 1 introduced educational sessions and case discussions, PDSA 2 implemented a clinical flowchart to guide decision-making, PDSA 3 included a knowledge retention quiz and PDSA 4 involved a repeat quiz and further discussions to consolidate learning. The target was to increase compliance rates from 70% to 85% or more.
resultsThe project successfully improved compliance rates by 30%, with the final compliance rate reaching 100%, surpassing the service provider's internal national average and target, respectively. 100% compliance was achieved and sustained during PDSA 4 until the end of the project. Clinician confidence and quiz scores also increased during the intervention.
conclusionsEducational initiatives, combined with practical tools like clinical flowcharts and quizzes, significantly improved compliance rates. The project provides a scalable model that can be adapted by other community healthcare services to enhance compliance with orthopaedic referrals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.