ArticleBMJ open2025
Efficacy and safety of dexamethasone compared to placebo in patients with severe influenza infection. (FLUDEX study): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in Spain.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06528444 (Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Phase III Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Dexamethasone Compared to Placebo in Patients With Severe Influenza), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Phase III Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Dexamethasone Compared to Placebo in Patients With Severe Influenza
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Corticosteroids in ARDS: old controversies, new insights, and future directions.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- The role of corticosteroids in severe viral pneumonia: lessons from COVID-19 and influenza.Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe combination with corticosteroids as immunomodulators has been the subject of debate in different infectious syndromes. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy (the percentage of patients hospitalised with influenza with a status of 3 or higher according to the Hospital Recovery Scale (HRS) on day 7 after the start of treatment) and safety of dexamethasone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Investigator-initiated multicentre, blinded, randomised placebo-controlled trial with two parallel treatment arms. The study population will consist of adult patients (over 18 years of age) hospitalised with severe influenza. One arm will receive one capsule of 6 mg of dexamethasone for 7 days, and the other arm will receive one capsule of placebo for 7 days of antibiotic treatment for 7 days or longer. Both groups will receive oseltamivir (75 mg/12 hours orally) for 5 days, extendable to 10 days depending on the investigator decision. Randomisation will occur in equal proportion (1:1). Patients with bronchial hyper-responsiveness that requires systemic corticosteroids for more than 24 hours, preinclusion treatment with corticosteroids for more than 24 hours at a dose equal to or higher than 1 mg/kg methylprednisolone (0.2 mg/kg dexamethasone or 1.25 mg/kg prednisone), inability to administer oral oseltamivir, patients with severe comorbidity with a life expectancy of <6 months in the opinion of the investigator and patients coinfected with SARS-CoV-2 or respiratory syncytial virus are ineligible. The primary endpoint is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone by comparing the percentage of patients hospitalised with influenza with a status of 3 or higher according to the HRS on day 7 after the start of treatment. Secondary endpoints include the time, in days, between initiation of treatment and clinical stability, serious adverse effects, metabolic impact of dexamethasone, average hospital stay, need for intensive care unit admission, need for intubation or death and mortality at days 10 and 30 postrandomisations. No interim safety analysis will be performed after. The sample size was calculated based on an expected reduction in the proportion of patients requiring oxygen from 22% to 10%-12%. Assuming a 5% alpha error, 80% power and a 10% anticipated dropout rate, the estimated sample size was 243 patients per group. The analyses will be performed on both intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the Institutional Review Board of Alicante Health Department-Dr. Balmis General University Hospital (LOC-100061146). The results of the main trial and each of the secondary endpoints will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06528444.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.