ArticleApplied clinical informatics2025
"Everyone Has a Role in This": Evaluating Organizational Readiness for a Digital Solution to Support Hypertension Care Teams and Patients.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors influencing implementation of telemedicine in rural dementia care services in high-income countries: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Development of a Patient-Facing Clinical Decision Support Application for Hypertension.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hypertension is a significant contributor to cardiovascular disease, yet evidence-based blood pressure (BP) control practices are inconsistently applied. The Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High Blood Pressure (COACH) is a digital clinical decision support tool designed to improve BP self-management and support clinician workflows. While the patient perspective on COACH has been evaluated in a separate study, this study evaluates organizational readiness for COACH implementation across three health systems using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).This study aimed to assess preimplementation facilitators and barriers for COACH, focusing on organizational readiness and modifiable factors influencing scalability.Qualitative interviews were conducted with 72 care team members from nine primary care clinics across three health systems using Epic or Oracle electronic health records. Data were analyzed using CFIR domains: innovation, inner setting, outer setting, individuals, and implementation process. Subdomains were rated from -2 (barrier) to +2 (facilitator).Overall, 79% of CFIR domain scores were positive, suggesting strong readiness for COACH implementation. The innovation domain scored 80% positive, highlighting COACH's user-friendly design, robust evidence base, and perceived advantages over current workflows. The inner setting domain showed 85% positive scores, driven by strong leadership, established infrastructures for patient-centered care, and high motivation for quality improvement. The outer setting domain scored 70% positive, reflecting barriers such as reimbursement policies, resource limitations, and staffing shortages. Participants noted the importance of continued leadership engagement, team-based support, and addressing workload challenges for sustainable implementation.The study demonstrates high organizational readiness for COACH, with critical barriers in reimbursement and resources that must be addressed for successful adoption. Findings underscore COACH's potential to enhance clinical decision-making and patient engagement. Future research should explore long-term impacts on care delivery and outcomes, informing broader adoption of digital health interventions in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.