Trial reportApplied clinical informatics2025
Lessons Learned from Sepsis Microlearning Intervention.
Trial report in Applied clinical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Improving early recognition and treatment of sepsis is key to decreasing patient mortality. A large academic health system implemented several quality improvement initiatives, yet monthly compliance with sepsis best practices remained low.Develop and evaluate an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded microlearning intervention to address suboptimal adherence to sepsis care best practices.We conducted a randomized stepped-wedge trial of our microlearning intervention with randomization done at the nursing block level. Antibiotic delay and secondary outcomes extracted from the EHR were analyzed using mixed models to account for intracluster correlation.The microlearning intervention did not reduce antibiotic delay (mean difference = 0.71 hours;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.