ArticleNeuroImage2025
Neural mechanisms of articulatory motor speech deficit in post-stroke aphasia: An ERP study.
Article in NeuroImage, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensory basis of speech motor learning and memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Effects of attentional instructions on neural and behavioral correlates of vocal auditory feedback control in post-stroke aphasia.NeuroImage · 2026Article
- The complex impact of auditory error direction, magnitude, and exposure on corrective responses.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Auditory-motor integration is crucial for speech production, yet its underlying neural mechanisms remain poorly understood in individuals with aphasia following left-hemisphere stroke. This study utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the neural correlates of speech production and auditory feedback control under a formant alteration paradigm in aphasia. A total of 20 participants with post-stroke aphasia and 22 controls performed a monosyllabic word production task under randomized normal (i.e. no shift) and altered auditory feedback (AAF) trials by applying a +30 % upward shift to the first formant (F1) frequency during concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) recordings. The analysis of pre-speech ERPs (readiness potentials) did not reveal any neural activity differences between and within groups. However, we found that the aphasia group exhibited significantly smaller ERP amplitudes compared with controls irrespective of auditory feedback condition following the onset of speech production. In addition, post-speech ERPs were significantly larger in the anterior vs. posterior regions in controls, but no such difference was present in the aphasia group. Moreover, no laterality effect was observed, suggesting a bilateral distribution of neural activities in both groups. Finally, the AAF did not elicit any between-group ERP differences, and this effect was consistent with behavioral compensatory responses to formant alterations. These findings highlight reduced articulatory neural responsiveness in aphasia, particularly in the anterior cortical regions implicated in speech production and motor control. The absence of the AAF effect suggests limited sensitivity to feedback alterations in both groups, potentially due to motor adaptation of the underlying mechanisms over repeated formant-shifting trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.