Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41005583›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2025

Neural mechanisms of articulatory motor speech deficit in post-stroke aphasia: An ERP study.

Vahid Nejati, Ayoub Daliri, Roozbeh Behroozmand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sensory basis of speech motor learning and memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vahid NejatiSpeech Neuroscience Lab, Department of Speech Language and Hearing, Callier Center for Communication Disorders, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Ayoub DaliriSpeech and Brain Research Lab, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Roozbeh BehroozmandSpeech Neuroscience Lab, Department of Speech Language and Hearing, Callier Center for Communication Disorders, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States. Electronic address: roozbeh.behroozmand@utdallas.edu.

Funding

Neural Bases of Vocal Sensorimotor Impairment in AphasiaR01DC018523 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI BEHROOZMAND, ROOZBEH · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
Auditory prediction and error evaluation in the speech of individuals who stutterR01DC020162 · NIDCD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI Ayoub Daliri · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
Improving speech motor learning processes using augmented behavioral interventionsR01DC019905 · NIDCD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI Ayoub Daliri · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
Sensorimotor processing of auditory feedback in aphasiaK01DC015831 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BEHROOZMAND, ROOZBEH · 2017 to 2021
$693k
NIDCD NIH HHS K01 DC015831NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018523NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019905NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory-motor integration is crucial for speech production, yet its underlying neural mechanisms remain poorly understood in individuals with aphasia following left-hemisphere stroke. This study utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the neural correlates of speech production and auditory feedback control under a formant alteration paradigm in aphasia. A total of 20 participants with post-stroke aphasia and 22 controls performed a monosyllabic word production task under randomized normal (i.e. no shift) and altered auditory feedback (AAF) trials by applying a +30 % upward shift to the first formant (F1) frequency during concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) recordings. The analysis of pre-speech ERPs (readiness potentials) did not reveal any neural activity differences between and within groups. However, we found that the aphasia group exhibited significantly smaller ERP amplitudes compared with controls irrespective of auditory feedback condition following the onset of speech production. In addition, post-speech ERPs were significantly larger in the anterior vs. posterior regions in controls, but no such difference was present in the aphasia group. Moreover, no laterality effect was observed, suggesting a bilateral distribution of neural activities in both groups. Finally, the AAF did not elicit any between-group ERP differences, and this effect was consistent with behavioral compensatory responses to formant alterations. These findings highlight reduced articulatory neural responsiveness in aphasia, particularly in the anterior cortical regions implicated in speech production and motor control. The absence of the AAF effect suggests limited sensitivity to feedback alterations in both groups, potentially due to motor adaptation of the underlying mechanisms over repeated formant-shifting trials.

Indexed as

AphasiaEvoked PotentialsFeedback, SensorySpeechStrokeAdultAgedElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAuditory feedbackEvent-related potentialsFormant shiftMotor controlPost-stroke aphasiaSensorimotor integrationSpeech production

Identifiers

PMID41005583
PMCPMC13090139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.