ArticleThe American journal of medicine2026
Association of documented high blood pressure measurements with time to hypertension diagnosis.
Article in The American journal of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extracting Signs and Symptoms of Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy from Clinical Notes Using Natural Language Processing.Maternal and child health journal · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDiagnostic delays contribute to uncontrolled hypertension, leading to increased morbidity, mortality and costs. The goal of this study was to estimate the duration of delays in the diagnosis of hypertension that contribute to uncontrolled hypertension in the US.
methodsWe collected data from the electronic health record for University of Iowa Healthcare from 2016 to 2022 for all patients with any BP record of 130/80 mmHg or greater but without an initial hypertension diagnosis. We used a Cox Proportional Hazards Model to determine the length of diagnostic delay as well as risk factors for delay. We specifically examined the presence of provider notes discussing BP or hypertension.
resultsOnly 5% of our cohort with BP readings of 130/80 mm Hg or greater were diagnosed with hypertension at the first visit. At one month, 7.4% were diagnosed, 10% within 3 months, increasing to 14% at 12 months. Most patients remained undiagnosed after at 12 months and 75% remained undiagnosed at 5 years. Shorter delays were associated with higher BP values, prior diagnoses of "high BP, not hypertension" and prior clinical notes discussing BP or hypertension. Shorter delays were also associated with other cardiovascular diagnoses, primary-care visits and inpatient stays.
conclusionsOur findings highlight the large number of missed opportunities to diagnose hypertension and demonstrate compelling reasons for improving clinical documentation related to high BP readings and increasing primary-care visits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.