ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
Mendelian randomization and FinnGen analysis of the causal relationship between 473 gut microbiota species and chronic sinusitis.
Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the causal associations between Gut Microbiota (GM) and Chronic Sinusitis (CRS) using Mendelian Randomization (MR).
methodsGenome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) summary statistics for 473 GM taxa were obtained from MiBioGen consortium. CRS data (22,099 cases vs. 371,520 controls) were sourced from the FinnGen R12 cohort. Causal effects were estimated via Inverse Variance-Weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, and Bayesian-weighted MR methods. Sensitivity analyses (heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy tests) were performed to validate robustness.
resultsIVW analysis identified 20 GM taxa significantly associated with CRS risk (p < 0.05). Of these, 7 taxa (e.g., Francisellales, Roseibacillus, Merdibacter massiliensis) exhibited risk-increasing effects, while 13 taxa (e.g., Firmicutes I, Succinivibrionaceae) showed protective effects. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the absence of significant heterogeneity (Cochran's Q p > 0.05) or pleiotropy (MR-Egger intercept p > 0.05). Bayesian-weighted MR validated 18 causal relationships (posterior probability > 95%), except for RUG420 sp900317985 and UBA7703 (non-significant).
conclusionsThis MR study provides genetic evidence supporting causal roles of specific GM taxa in CRS pathogenesis. These findings highlight the gut-sinus axis as a potential therapeutic target and underscore the utility of large-scale biobanks (e.g., FinnGen) in advancing precision medicine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5. Mendelian Randomized (MR) studies are second only to randomized controlled trials in terms of the level of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.