ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2025
Strategies for recruiting participants underrepresented in clinical research: A scoping review.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing parental health knowledge through digital knowledge mobilisation tools: a randomised controlled trial and qualitative study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Trial
- Multimodal Online Recruitment and Engagement of Black Breast Cancer Survivors for Mixed Methods Social Determinants of Health Research: Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Feasibility Study of an Early, Interdisciplinary, Non-Pharmacological Intervention for Patients at Risk of Developing Persistent Post-Traumatic Headache: The PTHEENOT intervention.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Article
- Gaps and insights toward evidence-based management for acute cholecystitis patients at high surgical risk.Endoscopic ultrasoundReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the 1993 National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act's mandate regarding underrepresented groups in clinical research, broad representation in clinical research is still lacking, making generalizability more difficult. Additionally, the extent of research that defines actionable strategies to encourage participation of a variety of patients in clinical research is unclear. This scoping review aimed to map evidence-based strategies for clinical research recruitment of underrepresented groups identified in the 1993 NIH Revitalization Act. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework, articles were included if they: (1) reported strategies used for adult patient recruitment, selection, or enrollment in human subjects research; (2) focused on recruiting underrepresented groups; (3) took place within the United States; and (4) were either randomized controlled trial designs, prospective or retrospective cohort studies, cross-sectional designs, quasi-experimental designs, or qualitative studies. We selected 67 articles which reported efforts to recruit underrepresented groups to have broad generalizability of treatment effects. The most successful strategies reported in the literature included recruiting in clinical/healthcare and community settings; using electronic health records and health/disease registries to identify patients; snowball sampling; newspaper and social media advertising; and mass mailing of letters. This paper offers a comprehensive review of the evidence-based recruitment strategies and materials for recruitment of groups that are historically underrepresented in a variety of clinical research studies, thus providing a set of recommendations for future researchers who aim to conduct scientifically rigorous clinical research studies with broad patient samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.