Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41004804›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2025

Understanding the Needs of Moderators in Online Mental Health Forums: Realist Synthesis and Recommendations for Support.

Heather Robinson, Millissa Booth, Lauren Fothergill, Claire Friedrich, Zoe Glossop, Jade Haines, Andrew Harding, Rose Johnston, Steven Jones, Karen Machin and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Heather RobinsonSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3566-2253
Millissa BoothSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0004-1900-2265
Lauren FothergillDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2144-7528
Claire FriedrichDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5841-4324
Zoe GlossopSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6151-4860
Jade HainesBerkshire Healthcare National Health Service Foundation Trust, Berkshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0005-4321-4775
Andrew HardingDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7240-2311
Rose JohnstonSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6863-2624
Steven JonesSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8801-5113
Karen MachinSurvivor Research Network, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0374-4238
Rachel MeacockDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8933-5058
Kristi NielsonDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0006-0271-6223
Paul MarshallSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3913-3359
Jo-Anne PuddephattDepartment of Psychology, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3441-4052
Tamara RakićSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8591-923X
Paul RaysonSchool of Computing and Communications, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1257-2191
Jo Rycroft-MaloneFaculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3858-5625
Nick ShryaneSocial Statistics, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7963-4601
Zoe SwithenbankDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3915-1618
Sara WiseBerkshire Healthcare National Health Service Foundation Trust, Berkshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0001-7778-7409
Fiona LobbanSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6594-4350

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been an increase in the use of online mental health forums to support mental health. These forums are often moderated by trained moderators to ensure a safe, therapeutic environment. While the moderator role is rewarding, it can also be challenging. There is a need to understand the impact of the role on moderators and how they can best be supported to maintain psychological well-being.

objectiveThis study aimed to understand how, why, and in what contexts moderator well-being is affected by the moderator role and produce actionable recommendations for how moderators can best be supported to maintain workplace psychological well-being.

methodsWe conducted realist synthesis of (1) published and gray literature from 2019 to 2023, (2) stakeholder interviews with forum moderators and hosts, and (3) moderator training manuals developed by organizations that host online mental health forums. Self-determination theory was used as the theoretical basis for this synthesis.

resultsWe developed 24 context-mechanism-outcome configurations from our realist analysis of 9 published papers, 18 interviews, and 5 training manuals. The findings highlight the specific ways in which moderator well-being can be supported through meeting the psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Forums that allow moderators to work in alignment with their personal motivations can increase moderator well-being. Forum organizations should support moderator competence through initial expectation setting, especially around moderator responsibility for user well-being, and ongoing support, such as meaningful supervision and peer support. Co-designed training, reflective practice, and experiential learning are all key to increasing moderator competence and satisfaction in the workplace. Working within a diverse team with access to innovative forum design can increase moderator psychological well-being. Organizational support for moderators' well-being through monitoring and encouraging self-care is vital to ensure moderators can effectively carry out their role. Making and supporting meaningful relationships in the forum can boost psychological well-being and the therapeutic value of the moderator role. Key challenges for moderators were dealing with conflicts between supporting open discussion and ensuring a safe community environment, sharing lived experiences in positive ways for both moderator and user, and supporting people within the limitations of an anonymous forum.

conclusionsThis realist synthesis is the first to examine the impacts on well-being of being a moderator of an online mental health forum. Recommendations to support moderator psychological well-being are proposed, targeted at specific stakeholder groups to aid implementation. Organizational-level endorsement and facilitation of support are particularly important for the realization of recommendations and interventions to support moderator well-being.

Indexed as

Mental HealthMental Health ServicesSocial SupportHumansartificial intelligencedigital mental healthmoderatorsonline forumspsychological well-beingself-determination theory

Identifiers

PMID41004804
PMCPMC12514405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.