SynthesisJornal brasileiro de nefrologia
Efficacy of D-mannose as prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) significantly impact the quality of life due to symptoms, effects on sexual activity, persistent pain, and recurrent antibiotic use. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of D-mannose in preventing recurrent UTIs.
methodsIn May 2024, we systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing D-mannose treatment with no intervention or standard antibiotic therapy in patients at high risk for recurrent UTI. We applied a random-effects model to pool relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsWe included 6 RCTs comprising 1,167 participants, of whom 534 received D-mannose and 521 (97.6%) were women. D-mannose was not associated with a reduction in recurrent UTI compared with control (RR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.29 - 1.15; p < 0.01) or antibiotics (RR: 0.39, 95% CI 0.12 - 1.25; p < 0.01). Further analyses showed that D-mannose did not improve outcomes in a subgroup of postmenopausal women.
conclusionIn this meta-analysis of RCTs, D-mannose did not reduce the incidence of recurrent UTIs compared with control or antibiotics in high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.