ArticleJMIRx med2025
COVID-19 Pneumonia Diagnosis Using Medical Images: Deep Learning-Based Transfer Learning Approach.
Article in JMIRx med, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early prediction of severe Omicron pneumonia using a multimodal a.i. model integrating delta CT radiomics and laboratory indicators.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- RDE-DR: robust deep ensemble CNNs for automated diabetic retinopathy detection from fundus images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, remains a global health concern due to its high transmissibility and evolving variants. Although vaccination efforts and therapeutic advancements have mitigated disease severity, emerging mutations continue to challenge diagnostics and containment strategies. As of mid-February 2025, global test positivity has risen to 11%, marking the highest level in over 6 months, despite widespread immunization efforts. Newer variants demonstrate enhanced host cell binding, increasing both infectivity and diagnostic complexity. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of deep transfer learning in delivering a rapid, accurate, and mutation-resilient COVID-19 diagnosis from medical imaging, with a focus on scalability and accessibility. Methods: An automated detection system was developed using state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks, including VGG16 (Visual Geometry Group network-16 layers), ResNet50 (residual network-50 layers), ConvNeXtTiny (convolutional next-tiny), MobileNet (mobile network), NASNetMobile (neural architecture search network-mobile version), and DenseNet121 (densely connected convolutional network-121 layers), to detect COVID-19 from chest X-ray and computed tomography (CT) images. Results: Among all the models evaluated, DenseNet121 emerged as the best-performing architecture for COVID-19 diagnosis using X-ray and CT images. It achieved an impressive accuracy of 98%, with a precision of 96.9%, a recall of 98.9%, an F1-score of 97.9%, and an area under the curve score of 99.8%, indicating a high degree of consistency and reliability in detecting both positive and negative cases. The confusion matrix showed minimal false positives and false negatives, underscoring the model's robustness in real-world diagnostic scenarios. Given its performance, DenseNet121 is a strong candidate for deployment in clinical settings and serves as a benchmark for future improvements in artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic tools. Conclusions: The study results underscore the potential of artificial intelligence-powered diagnostics in supporting early detection and global pandemic response. With careful optimization, deep learning models can address critical gaps in testing, particularly in settings constrained by limited resources or emerging variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.