ArticlePloS one2025
Heterogeneous impact of anti-bullying laws on school bullying in the State of Georgia.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of bullying behavior has made anti-bullying laws (ABL) and policies a public health priority in the United States. Using 2007-2016 data from the Georgia Student Health Survey 2.0 on 6-12 grade public school students, we examine the relationship between two ABLs-with different levels of stringency-and the prevalence of bullying behavior in the state of Georgia. We find that although the implementation of both Georgia's ABLs is associated with significant declines in the prevalence of bullying victimization, the more stringent ABL is associated with substantially larger reductions in reported cases. Our heterogeneity analysis based on external environment characteristics shows that the more stringent ABL is associated with smaller reductions in bullying victimization incidents in schools with a higher share of students enrolled in the federally subsidized school lunch program. The more stringent ABL is also associated with larger increases in bystanders' willingness to intervene in school districts with higher poverty rates among children aged 5-17. Lastly, we analyze disparities in bullying victimization reporting at the school level and find that students tend to report higher bullying victimization rates than school personnel, and that the two ABLs are associated with larger reductions in the student reporting than in personnel reporting. Our results also show that the reporting disparities fade away when ABLs are in place, providing further evidence of the role of ABLs in mitigating bullying victimization reporting discrepancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.