ArticlePloS one2025
Behind political affiliation: How moral values, identity politics, and party loyalty have affected COVID-19 vaccination.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Falling short of its vaccination goals, the United States faced a critical challenge in ending the pandemic, with political partisanship emerging as a barrier to COVID-19 vaccination uptake. This study investigates the relationship between partisanship, moral values, and vaccination compliance in 3099 US counties during the vaccination campaign, employing descriptive statistics and panel regressions. The findings reveal that the relationship between political partisanship and vaccination uptake varies highly when considering three factors: historical party rootedness, party factions, and co-partisan state governors. We report a widening vaccination rate gap between Republican and Democratic counties, particularly when considering the historical partisanship of a county. Our analysis also reveals that Republican counties with strong support for Trump had vaccination rates that were 2% to 5.9% lower than those observed in Republican counties with low support for Trump. Importantly, moral values significantly mediate the association between partisanship and vaccination compliance. High levels of communal values reduce the predictive power of partisanship and strong support for Trump in explaining vaccination rates by up to 56% and 80%, respectively. The presence of a co-partisan state governor was linked to approximately 3.5% higher vaccination rates in Republican counties and 3.1% higher rates in Democratic-leaning ones. This study demonstrates that the factors explaining vaccine compliance extend beyond dichotomous political orientation. The role of individual moral values is significant in this context. To be most effective, vaccination campaigns-and corresponding messages-should be tailored to reflect the moral and partisanship milieu of their target demographics. The involvement of political leaders, especially in Republican-leaning areas, emerges as a key strategy for increasing vaccine acceptance among these groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.