ArticlePloS one2025
Psychometric properties of a Korean version of the pre-sleep arousal scale.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSleep quality is a multidimensional construct encompassing the effectiveness and restorativeness of sleep. The pre-sleep arousal scale is a widely used instrument for evaluating aspects of arousal that are closely related to sleep quality. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the pre-sleep arousal scale (K-PSAS).
methodsWe performed a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from 286 adults aged 19-70 years who used electronic cigarettes or heated tobacco products. The original PSAS was translated into Korean, with content validity assessed by experts. Construct validity was evaluated via exploratory factor analysis, and concurrent validity was assessed by correlating the K-PSAS with the Insomnia Severity Index, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Reliability was examined using Cronbach's α, and split-half reliability coefficient.
resultsBoth the item-level content validity index for all items and the scale-level content validity index average for the K-PSAS-16 were 1.0. After removing the survey item on "being mentally alert and active at bedtime" (item 13) due to low factor loading, the K-PSAS-15 demonstrated a two-factor structure, with somatic and cognitive arousal factors explaining 42.36% and 10.19% of the variance, respectively. A significant positive correlation was observed between the two factors (ρ = 0.61, p < .001). Item 13 also showed a low corrected item-total correlation coefficient of -0.10. The correlation coefficients between K-PSAS-15 and other validated scales ranged from 0.49 to 0.71. The K-PSAS-15 showed good internal consistency, with a Cronbach's α of.91 for the total scale, and α = .87 and.90 for the somatic and cognitive subscales, respectively. Split-half reliability was also acceptable (total = .90; somatic = .86; cognitive = .88).
conclusionThe K-PSAS-15, which excludes one poorly performing item from the original scale, is a reliable and valid tool for assessing pre-sleep arousal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.